Methods for conferring or enhancing herbicide resistance on plants and/or alga with protoporphyrinogen oxidase variants

ABSTRACT

Provided are methods for conferring and/or enhancing herbicide resistance on plants or algae including agricultural crops by introducing prokaryote-derived protoporphynnogen oxidase variants.

TECHNICAL FIELD

Provided are methods for conferring and/or enhancing herbicide resistance on plants and/or alga including agricultural crops by introducing prokaryote-derived protoporphyrinogen oxidase variants.

BACKGROUND ART

A porphyrin biosynthetic pathway serves for the synthesis of chlorophyll and heme which play a vital role in plant metabolism, and it takes place in the chloroplast. In this pathway, protoporphyrinogen IX oxidase (hereinafter, referred to as PPO; EC:1.3.3.4) catalyzes the oxidation of protoporphyrinogen IX to protoporphyrin IX. After the oxidation of protoporphyrinogen IX to protoporphyrin IX, protoporphyrin IX binds with magnesium by Mg-chelatase to synthesize chlorophyll, and it binds with iron by Fe-chelatase to synthesize heme.

Therefore, when PPO activity is inhibited, synthesis of chlorophylls and heme is inhibited and the substrate protoporphyrinogen IX leaves the normal porphyrin biosynthetic pathway, resulting in the rapid export of protoporphyrinogen IX from the chloroplast to the cytoplasm, and cytoplasmic protoporphyrin IX accumulation caused by the oxidation. Protoporphyrin IX thus accumulated generates highly reactive singlet oxygen (¹O₂) in the presence of light and oxygen molecules to destroy cell membrane, rapidly leading to plant cell death. Based on this principle, herbicides inhibiting PPO activity have been developed. Until now, there have been 9 families of herbicides, including pyrimidinediones, diphenyl-ethers, phenylpyrazoles, N-phenylphthalimides, thiadiazoles, oxadiazoles, triazolinones, oxazolidinediones, and others herbicides, which are classified according to their chemical structures.

Further, in order to prevent effects of these herbicides on the growth of crops while using the herbicides, there is a need to provide herbicide resistance for the crops.

Meanwhile, as photosynthetic organisms, algae have the capacity to transform sunlight into energy that can be used to synthesize a variety of useful compounds. Through photosynthetic carbon fixation, algae can convert CO₂ to sugar, starch, lipids, fats, or other biomolecules, for example, thereby removing a greenhouse gas from the atmosphere. Furthermore, large scale cultures of algae can be used to produce a variety of biomolecules for use as industrial enzymes, therapeutic compounds and proteins, nutritional products, commercial products, or fuel products, for example.

A major problem in the large scale cultures of algae in bioreactors or open or closed ponds is that they can become contaminated by other, highly competitive but unwanted species of algae fungi and bacteria, as well as by rotifers and other zooplankton that devour the desired species in the cultures.

Thus, there is a need to confer herbicide resistance to the algae, in order for the herbicide resistant algae to be able to grow in the presence of the herbicide at a concentration that deters growth of competing organisms not harboring the herbicide resistance gene.

DISCLOSURE Technical Problem

It is observed that hemY-type PPO gene derived from prokaryotes conferred a broad herbicide resistance against 9 types of PPO-inhibiting herbicides. In addition, it is verified that this gene is expressed in plants or algae, and confers a herbicide resistance trait on the plants or algae. Based thereon, methods for conferring and/or enhancing herbicide resistance on plants including agricultural crops or algae by introducing prokaryote-derived protoporphyrinogen oxidase variants are provided.

One embodiment provides a composition for conferring and/or enhancing herbicide resistance on a plant or an alga, the composition including one or more polypeptides selected from the group consisting of a polypeptide containing an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or an amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; a polypeptide containing an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3 or an amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; a polypeptide containing an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5 or an amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; and a polypeptide containing an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 7 or an amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto.

Another embodiment provides a composition for conferring and/or enhancing herbicide resistance trait on a plant or an alga, the composition including one or more genes selected from the group consisting of gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; and gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 7 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto.

In an exemplary embodiment, the gene may include a gene containing a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2 or a nucleotide sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; a gene containing a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4 or a nucleotide sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; a gene containing a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 6 or a nucleotide sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; or a gene containing a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 8 or a nucleotide sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto.

In another exemplary embodiment, the gene may be included in a recombinant plant expression gene cassette vector or a recombinant algae expression gene cassette vector.

In another exemplary embodiment, the herbicide may be protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides.

In another exemplary embodiment, the herbicide may be one or more selected from the group consisting of pyrimidinediones, diphenyl-ethers, phenylpyrazoles, N-phenylphthalimides, thiadiazoles, oxadiazoles, triazolinones, oxazolidinediones, and any combinations thereof.

In another exemplary embodiment, the herbicide may be one or more selected from the group consisting of butafenacil, saflufenacil, benzfendizone, tiafenacil, fomesafen, oxyfluorfen, aclonifen, acifluorfen, bifenox, ethoxyfen, lactofen, chlomethoxyfen, chlorintrofen, fluoroglycofen-ethyl, halosafen, pyraflufen-ethyl, fluazolate, flumioxazin, cinidon-ethyl, flumiclorac-pentyl, fluthiacet, thidiazimin, oxadiargyl, oxadiazon, carfentrazone, sulfentrazone, azafenidin, pentoxazone, pyraclonil, flufenpyr-ethyl, profluazol and any combinations thereof.

In another exemplary embodiment, the plant may be monocotyledonous plants, dicotyledonous plants, herbaceous plants, or/and woody plants.

In another exemplary embodiment, the plant or the alga may be genetically engineered to additionally contain a second polypeptide or a second gene encoding the corresponding peptides, thereby having more broadened herbicide resistance against the second herbicide.

In another exemplary embodiment, the second herbicide may include a cell division-inhibiting herbicide, a photosynthesis-inhibiting herbicide, an amino acid synthesis-inhibiting herbicide, a plastid-inhibiting herbicide, and a cell membrane-inhibiting herbicide, but is not limited thereto.

In another exemplary embodiment, the second herbicide may be exemplified by glyphosate, glufosinate, dicamba, 2,4-D(2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid), isoxaflutole, ALS (acetolactate synthase)-inhibiting herbicide, a photosystem II-inhibiting herbicide, a phenylurea-based herbicide, a bromoxynil-based herbicide or any combinations thereof, but is not limited thereto.

In another exemplary embodiment, the second polypeptide conferring herbicide-resistance on a plant or an alga may be exemplified by the peptides conferring herbicide resistance with one or more selected from the group consisting of glyphosate herbicide-resistant EPSPS (glyphosate resistant 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase), GOX (glyphosate oxidase), GAT (glyphosate-N-acetyltransferase), or glyphosate decarboxylase; glufosinate herbicide-resistant PAT (phosphinothricin-N-acetyltransferase); dicamba herbicide-resistant DMO (monooxygenase); 2,4-D herbicide-resistant 2,4-D monooxygenase or AAD(aryloxyalkanoate Dioxygenase); ALS-inhibiting sulfonylurea-based herbicide-resistant ALS (Acetolactate Synthase), AHAS (acetohydroxyacid synthase), or AtAHASL (Acetohydroxyacid synthase Large Subunit); photosystem II-inhibiting herbicide-resistant photosystem II protein D1; phenylurea-based herbicide-resistant cytochrome P450; plastid-inhibiting herbicide-resistant HPPD (Hydroxylphenylpyruvate dioxygenase); bromoxynil herbicide-resistant nitrilase; and any combinations thereof, but is not limited thereto.

Further, the gene encoding the second polypeptide conferring herbicide-resistance may be exemplified by one or more selected from the nucleotide group consisting of glyphosate herbicide-resistant CP4 EPSPS, EPSPS(AG), MEPSPS, 2MEPSPS, GOXV247, GAT4601, or GAT4621 gene; glufosinate herbicide-resistant BAR, PAT, or PAT(SYN) gene; dicamba herbicide-resistant DMO gene; 2,4-D herbicide-resistant AAD-1 or AAD-12 gene; ALS-inhibiting sulfonylurea-based herbicide-resistant ALS, GM-HRA, S4-HRA, ZM-HRA, CSR1, CSR1-1, CSR1-2, SURA, or SURB; photosystem II-inhibiting herbicide-resistant PSBA gene; phenylurea herbicide-resistant CYP76B1 gene; isoxaflutole herbicide-resistant HPPDPF W336 gene; bromoxynil herbicide-resistant BXN gene; and any combinations thereof, but is not limited thereto.

Another embodiment provides genetically modified organism harboring a new or novel or/and enhanced herbicide resistance, or clone or progenies thereof, the transformant or the clone or progeny thereof expressing one or more selected from the group consisting of the polypeptides containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto, or the gene encoding the polypeptide; the polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto, or the gene encoding the polypeptide; the polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto, or the gene encoding the polypeptide; the polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 7 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto, or the gene encoding the polypeptide; and any combinations thereof.

In an exemplary embodiment, the targets for genetic modification may be an alga, plant cell, protoplast, callus, hypocotyl, seed, cotyledon, shoot, or plant.

Another embodiment provides a method of generating a genetically modified plant or an alga showing a novel or novel or/and enhanced herbicide resistance, the methods include the procedures of transforming an alga, plant cell, protoplast, callus, hypocotyl, seed, cotyledon, shoot, or plant expressing one or more selected from the group consisting of the polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto, or the gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide; the polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto, or the gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide; the polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto, or the gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide; the polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 7 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto, or the gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide; and any combinations thereof.

Another embodiment provides a method of conferring and/or enhancing herbicide resistance on a plant or an alga. The method includes the procedure of transforming an alga, plant cell, protoplast, callus, a hypocotyl, seed, cotyledon, shoot, or plant with one or more genes selected from the group consisting of the gene encoding the polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; the gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; the gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; the gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 7 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; and any combinations thereof.

Another embodiment provides a method for controlling weeds in a cropland. The method includes the procedure of providing the cropland with the a genetically modified plant containing the polypeptide or gene selected from the group consisting of the polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto or the gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide; the polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto, or the gene encoding the polypeptide; the polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto, or the gene encoding the polypeptide; the polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 7 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto, or the gene encoding the polypeptide; and any combinations thereof, and then applying an effective dosage of protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides to the cropland.

In an exemplary embodiment, applying an effective dosage of a protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicide to the cropland may be performed by applying two or more of protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides in combination at an effective dosage thereof, sequentially or simultaneously.

In another exemplary embodiment, the plant may genetically modified to express a second polypeptide conferring herbicide-resistance or a gene encoding the corresponding peptides. Two herbicides, protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicide and the second herbicide, may be applied to the cropland at an effective dosage thereof, sequentially or simultaneously.

Another embodiment provides a method for controlling undesired aquatic species in a cultivation medium. The method includes the procedure of providing the cultivation medium with the a genetically modified alga containing the polypeptide or gene selected from the group consisting of the polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto or the gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide; the polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto, or the gene encoding the polypeptide; the polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto, or the gene encoding the polypeptide; the polypeptide containing the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 7 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto, or the gene encoding the polypeptide; and any combinations thereof, and then applying an effective dosage of protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides to the cultivation medium.

Technical Solution

One embodiment provides a composition for conferring and/or enhancing herbicide resistance on a plant or an alga. The compositions may include one or more polypeptide selected from the group consisting of a polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or an amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; a polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3 or an amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; a polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5 or an amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; a polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 7 or an amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; and any combinations thereof.

Another embodiment provides a composition for conferring and/or enhancing herbicide resistance on a plant or an alga. The composition may includes one or more genes selected from the group consisting of a gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; a gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; a gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; a gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 7 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; and any combinations thereof. Still other embodiments provide a polypeptide for use in conferring or/and enhancing herbicide resistance on a plant or an alga, the polypeptide is one or more selected from the group consisting of a polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or an amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; a polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3 or an amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; a polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5 or an amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 7 or an amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; and any combinations thereof.

Still other embodiments provide a gene for use in conferring or/and enhancing herbicide resistance on a plant or an alga, the gene is one or more selected from the group consisting of a gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; a gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; a gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; a gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 7 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; and any combinations thereof.

Still other embodiments provide a transformant having herbicide resistance, the transformant being transformed with the gene.

Still other embodiments provide a method of preparing a plant or an alga having herbicide resistance, the method including transforming an alga, a plant cell, a protoplast, a callus, a hypocotyl, a seed, a cotyledon, a shoot or a plant with the gene.

Still other embodiments provide a method for conferring and/or enhancing herbicide resistance on a plant or an alga, the method including transforming an alga, a plant cell, a protoplast, a callus, a hypocotyl, a seed, a cotyledon, a shoot, or a plant with the gene.

Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail.

In the present invention, provided are Oscillatoria nigro-viridis PCC 7112-derived PPO, which is named CyPPO2, an amino acid sequence thereof represented by SEQ ID NO: 1, and a gene encoding the corresponding peptides represented by a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2.

Further, provided are Lyngbya sp. PCC 8106 strain-derived PPO, which is named CyPPO4, an amino acid sequence thereof represented by SEQ ID NO: 3, and a gene encoding the corresponding peptides represented by a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4.

Further, provided are Halothece sp. PCC 7418 strain-derived PPO, which is named CyPPO8, an amino acid sequence thereof represented by SEQ ID NO: 5, and a gene encoding the corresponding peptides represented by a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 6.

Further, provided are Microcoleus vaginatus strain-derived PPO, which is named CyPPO12, an amino acid sequence thereof represented by SEQ ID NO: 7, and a gene encoding the corresponding peptides represented by a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 8. The amino acid sequence of CyPPO12 has 94% sequence homology with that of CyPPO2.

The herbicide-resistant PPO proteins provided herein may include an additional alteration within the scope that does not generally alter the activity of the molecules. Such alteration may include substitution, deletion, addition, and/or insertion of amino acids. For example, amino acid exchanges in proteins and peptides, which do not generally alter the activity of the molecules, are known in the art. The most commonly occurring exchanges are Ala/Ser, Val/Ile, Asp/Glu, Thr/Ser, Ala/Gly, Ala/Thr, Ser/Asn, Ala/Val, Ser/Gly, Thr/Phe, Ala/Pro, Lys/Arg, Asp/Asn, Leu/Ile, Leu/Val, Ala/Glu, Asp/Gly, in both directions, but are not limited thereto. The protein, if desired, may be modified by phosphorylation, sulfation, acrylation, glycosylation, methylation, farnesylation, etc. In addition, the protein variants may include a protein which has increased structural stability against heat, pH, etc. or has increased activity by alteration or modification of the amino acid sequence.

Further, the herbicide-resistant PPO protein may be a variant which has a biological activity equivalent to that of the polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, SEQ ID NO: 3, SEQ ID NO: 5, or SEQ ID NO: 7. The variant may include substitution, deletion, addition, and/or insertion of amino acids, compared to a wild type or benchmark reference protein, and has a biological activity similar or equivalent to that of the wild type or benchmark reference protein. In this context, the term “sequence homology” refers to the degree of similarity to the wild-type or reference amino acid sequence or nucleotide sequence. Any protein may be included in the scope of the present invention, as long as it includes amino acid residues having 60% or higher, 65% or higher, 70% or higher, 75% or higher, 80% or higher, 85% or higher, 90% or higher, 95% or higher, 98% or higher, or 99% or higher identity to the amino acid sequence of the herbicide-resistant PPO protein provided herein, and also retains a biological activity equivalent to the polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, SEQ ID NO: 3, SEQ ID NO: 5 or SEQ ID NO: 7. Such protein equivalent may include an active site equivalent to that of the desired protein. Homology comparisons may be conducted by eye or with the aid of readily available comparison programs. These commercially available computer programs may calculate percent (%) homology between two or more sequences, and homology (%) may be calculated over contiguous sequences. The sequence alignment for comparison may be conducted by methods known in the art, for example, GAP, BESTFIT, BLAST, FASTA and TFASTA.

Further, the herbicide-resistant PPO gene used in the disclosure may include a nucleic acid molecule including codons functionally equivalent to the nucleotide sequence of the gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, SEQ ID NO: 3, SEQ ID NO: 5 or SEQ ID NO: 7, or codons encoding the identical amino acids (by degeneration of codons), or codons encoding biologically equivalent amino acids. Further, the scope of the present invention may also include a nucleic acid molecule, which encodes a protein retaining an activity biologically equivalent to that of the herbicide-resistant PPO protein, and also includes nucleotides having at least 60% or higher, 65% or higher, 70% or higher, 75% or higher, 80% or higher, 85% or higher, 90% or higher, 95% or higher, 98% or higher, or 99% or higher identity thereto when the nucleotide sequence of the gene encoding the herbicide-resistant PPO protein provided herein and any other different nucleotide sequence are aligned for maximum matching, and the aligned sequences are analyzed using an algorithm generally used in the art.

In an exemplary embodiment, the herbicide-resistant PPO protein provided herein includes one or more polypeptides selected from the group consisting of a polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or an amino acid sequence having 95% or 98% or higher homology thereto; a polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3 or an amino acid sequence having 95% or 98% or higher homology thereto; a polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5 or an amino acid sequence having 95% or 98% or higher homology thereto; a polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 7 or an amino acid sequence having 95% or 98% or higher homology thereto; and any combinations thereof.

Further, the herbicide-resistant PPO gene includes one or more genes selected from the group consisting of a gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or 98% or higher homology thereto; a gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or 98% or higher homology thereto; a gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or 98% or higher homology thereto; a gene encoding the corresponding polypeptide comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 7 or the amino acid sequence having 95% or 98% or higher homology thereto; and any combinations thereof.

The gene may be, for example, a gene comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2 or a nucleotide sequence having 95% or 98% or higher homology thereto, a gene comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4 or a nucleotide sequence having 95% or 98% or higher homology thereto, a gene comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 6 or a nucleotide sequence having 95% or 98% or higher homology thereto, a gene comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 8 or a nucleotide sequence having 95% or 98% or higher homology thereto, and/or any combinations thereof, but is not limited thereto.

The herbicide-resistant PPO protein may be obtained from a natural source by extraction and purification using methods widely known in the art. Alternatively, it may be obtained as a synthetic protein prepared by chemical synthesis, or as a recombinant protein prepared by a genetic recombination technology. When chemically synthesized, the protein may be obtained by a polypeptide synthesis method widely known in the art. When the genetic recombination technology is used, the nucleic acid encoding the herbicide-resistant PPO protein is inserted into a proper expression vector, this vector is transformed into a host cell, the host cell is cultured to express the desired protein, and then the herbicide-resistant PPO protein is recovered from the host cell. After the protein is expressed in a selected host cell, general biochemical separation techniques, for example, treatment with a protein precipitating agent (salting out), centrifugation, ultrasonic disruption, ultrafiltration, dialysis, chromatography such as molecular sieve chromatography (gel filtration), adsorption chromatography, ion exchange chromatography, affinity chromatography and the like may be used for the isolation and purification thereof. Generally, in order to separate the protein with a high purity, these methods may be used in combination.

The herbicide-resistant PPO nucleic acid molecule may be isolated or prepared using standard molecular biological techniques, for example, a chemical synthesis or recombination method. Alternatively, commercially available one may be used.

In a specific embodiment, the PPO proteins were found to exhibit a broad herbicide resistance against representative 9 families of PPO activity-inhibiting herbicides classified according to their chemical structures in an herbicide resistance test system using PPO-deficient E. coli BT3(ΔPPO). It was also found that the proteins may be expressed in tobacco leaves by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, and they may be also expressed in the chloroplast of a plant by using a transit peptide (TP). Further, it was found that the PPO proteins may be also expressed in Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia) by a plant expression vector. Even though the transformed plants are treated with PPO activity-inhibiting herbicides, germination and growth of the plants are observed. Furthermore, inheritance of the above herbicide-resistant traits to the next generation was confirmed by an inheritance study.

Therefore, the PPO protein provided herein may be introduced into a plant or an alga, thereby being used for enhancement of the herbicide resistance of the plant or the alga.

As used herein, the “herbicide” refers to an active ingredient that kills, controls or otherwise adversely modifies the growth of plants or algae. As used herein, the “herbicide tolerance” or “herbicide resistance” means that even after treatment of a herbicide which normally kills a normal or wild-type plant or alga or normally inhibits growth thereof, inhibition of the plant or alga growth is weakened or eliminated, compared to that of the normal or wild-type plant or alga, and therefore, the plant or the alga continues to grow. The herbicide includes an herbicide inhibiting protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO) of a plant. Such PPO-inhibiting herbicide may be classified into pyrimidinediones, diphenyl-ethers, phenylpyrazoles, N-phenylphthalimides, thiadiazoles, oxadiazoles, triazolinones, oxazolidinediones, and other herbicides according to their chemical structures.

In an exemplary embodiment, the pyrimidinedione-based herbicide includes butafenacil, saflufenacil, benzfendizone, and tiafenacil, but is not limited thereto.

The diphenyl-ether-based herbicide includes fomesafen, oxyfluorfen, aclonifen, acifluorfen, bifenox, ethoxyfen, lactofen, chlomethoxyfen, chlorintrofen, fluoroglycofen-ethyl, and halosafen, but is not limited thereto.

The phenylpyrazole-based herbicide includes pyraflufen-ethyl and fluazolate, but is not limited thereto.

The phenylphthalimide-based herbicide includes flumioxazin, cinidon-ethyl, and flumiclorac-pentyl, but is not limited thereto.

The thiadiazole-based herbicide includes fluthiacet and thidiazimin, but is not limited thereto.

The oxadiazole-based herbicide includes oxadiargyl and oxadiazon, but is not limited thereto.

The triazolinone-based herbicide includes carfentrazone, sulfentrazone, and azafenidin, but is not limited thereto.

The oxazolidinedione-based herbicide includes pentoxazone, but is not limited thereto.

Other herbicides include pyraclonil, flufenpyr-ethyl and profluazol, but is not limited thereto.

The herbicide-resistant PPO gene provided herein may be introduced into the plant or the algae by various methods known in the art, and preferably, by using an expression vector for plant or algae transformation.

An appropriate promoter which may be included in the vector may be any promoter generally used in the art for introduction of the gene into the plant or the alga. For example, the promoter for plant transformation may include an SP6 promoter, a T7 promoter, a T3 promoter, a PM promoter, a maize ubiquitin promoter, a cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter, a nopaline synthase(nos) promoter, a figwort mosaic virus 35S promoter, a sugarcane bacilliform virus promoter, a commelina yellow mottle virus promoter, a light-inducible promoter from the small subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (ssRUBISCO), a rice cytosolic triosephosphate isomerase (TPI) promoter, an adenine phosphoribosyltransferae (APRT) promoter of Arabidopsis, an octopine synthase promoter, and a BCB (blue copper binding protein) promoter, but is not limited thereto. Further, the vector for plant transformation may include a poly A signal sequence causing polyadenylation of 3′-terminus, and for example, it may include NOS 3′-end derived from a nopaline synthase gene of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, an octopine synthase terminator derived from an octopine synthase gene of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, 3′-end of protease inhibitor I or II gene of tomato or potato, a CaMV 35S terminator, a rice α-amylase terminator RAmyl A, and a phaseoline terminator, but is not limited thereto.

Further, the promoter for algae transformation may be a chloroplast specific promoter, a nuclear promoter, a constitutive promoter or an inducible promoter. The the gene encoding the herbicide-resistant PPO gene provided herein may be operably linked to a 5′ UTR or 3′ UTR that functions in the nucleus of the alga. Further, the vector for algae transformation may include a transcriptional regulatory sequence for expression of the gene in the nucleus of the alga. A recombinant gene conferring herbicide resistance may be integrated into the nuclear genome or chloroplast genome of a host alga.

In the vector, a transit peptide required for targeting to chloroplasts may be linked to 5′-end of the PPO gene in order to express the herbicide-resistant PPO gene in the chloroplasts.

Optionally, the vector may further include a gene encoding selectable marker as a reporter molecule, and example of the selectable marker may include antibiotics (e.g., neomycin, carbenicillin, kanamycin, spectinomycin, hygromycin, bleomycin, chloramphenicol, etc.) or herbicide (glyphosate, glufosinate, phosphinothricin, etc.)-resistant genes, but is not limited thereto.

Further, the recombinant vector for plant expression may include an Agrobacterium binary vector, a cointegration vector, or a general vector which has no T-DNA region but is designed to be expressed in the plant. Of them, the binary vector refers to a vector containing two separate vector systems harboring one plasmid responsible for migration consisting of left border (LB) and right border (RB) in Ti (tumor inducible) plasmid, and the other plasmid for target gene-transferring, and the vector may include a promoter region and a polyadenylation signal sequence for expression in plants.

When the binary vector or cointegration vector is used, a strain for transformation of the recombinant vector into the plant is preferably Agrobacterium (Agrobacterium-mediated transformation). In this regard, Agrobacterium tumefaciens or Agrobacterium rhizogenes may be used. In addition, when the vector having no T-DNA region is used, electroporation, microparticle bombardment, polyethylene glycol-mediated uptake, etc. may be used for introduction of the recombinant plasmid into the plant.

The plant transformed with the gene by the above method may be re-differentiated into a plant through callus induction, rhizogenesis, and soil acclimatization using a standard technique known in the art.

The plant subjected to transformation herein is understood by a meaning including a plant cell (containing a suspension-cultured cell), a protoplast, a callus, a hypocotyl, a seed, a cotyledon, a shoot as well as a mature plant.

Further, the scope of the transformant includes a transformant introduced with the gene as well as a clone or progeny thereof (T1 generation, T2 generation, or any subsequent generations). For example, the transformed plant also includes a plant having the inherited herbicide resistance traits as sexual and asexual progeny of the plant transformed with the gene provided herein. The scope of the present invention also includes all mutants and variants showing the characteristics of the initial transformed plant, together with all hybridization and fusion products of the plant transformed with the gene provided herein. Furthermore, the scope of the present invention also includes a part of the plant, such as a seed, a flower, a stem, a fruit, a leaf, a root, a tuber, a tuberous root, which is originated from a transformed plant which is transformed in advance by the method of the present invention, or a progeny thereof, and is composed of at least a part of the transformed cells.

The plant, to which the present invention is applied, is not particularly limited to, but includes monocotyledonous or dicotyledonous plants. Further, the plant includes herbaceous plants or woody plants. The monocotyledonous plant may include plants belonging to the family Alismataceae, Hydrocharitaceae, Juncaginaceae, Scheuchzeriaceae, Potamogetonaceae, Najadaceae, Zosteraceae, Liliaceae, Haemodoraceae, Agavaceae, Amaryllidaceae, Dioscoreaceae, Pontederiaceae, Iridaceae, Burmanniaceae, Juncaceae, Commelinaceae, Eriocaulaceae, Gramineae Poaceae, Araceae, Lemnaceae, Sparganiaceae, Typhaceae, Cyperaceae, Musaceae, Zingiberaceae, Cannaceae, Orchidaceae, but is not limited thereto.

The dicotyledonous plant may include plants belonging to the family Diapensiaceae, Clethraceae, Pyrolaceae, Ericaceae, Myrsinaceae, Primulaceae, Plumbaginaceae, Ebenaceae, Styracaceae, Symplocaceae, Symplocaceae, Oleaceae, Loganiaceae, Gentianaceae, Menyanthaceae, Apocynaceae, Asclepiadaceae, Rubiaceae, Polemoniaceae, Convolvulaceae, Boraginaceae, Verbenaceae, Labiatae, Solanaceae, Scrophulariaceae, Bignoniaceae, Acanthaceae, Pedaliaceae, Orobanchaceae, Gesneriaceae, Lentibulariaceae, Phrymaceae, Plantaginaceae, Caprifoliaceae, Adoxaceae, Valerianaceae, Dipsacaceae, Campanulaceae, Compositae, Myricaceae, Juglandaceae, Salicaceae, Betulaceae, Fagaceae, Ulmaceae, Moraceae, Urticaceae, Santalaceae, Loranthaceae, Polygonaceae, Phytolaccaceae, Nyctaginaceae, Aizoaceae, Portulacaceae, Caryophyllaceae, Chenopodiaceae, Amaranthaceae, Cactaceae, Magnoliaceae, Illiciaceae, Lauraceae, Cercidiphyllaceae, Ranunculaceae, Berberidaceae, Lardizabalaceae, Meni spermaceae, Nymphaeaceae, Ceratophyllaceae, Cabombaceae, Saururaceae, Piperaceae, Chloranthaceae, Aristolochiaceae, Actinidiaceae, Theaceae, Guttiferae, Droseraceae, Papaveraceae, Capparidaceae, Cruciferae, Platanaceae, Hamamelidaceae, Crassulaceae, Saxifragaceae, Eucommiaceae, Pittosporaceae, Rosaceae, Leguminosae, Oxalidaceae, Geraniaceae, Tropaeolaceae, Zygophyllaceae, Linaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Callitrichaceae, Rutaceae, Simaroubaceae, Meliaceae, Polygalaceae, Anacardiaceae, Aceraceae, Sapindaceae, Hippocastanaceae, Sabiaceae, Balsaminaceae, Aquifoliaceae, Celastraceae, Staphyleaceae, Buxaceae, Empetraceae, Rhamnaceae, Vitaceae, Elaeocarpaceae, Tiliaceae, Malvaceae, Sterculiaceae, Thymelaeaceae, Elaeagnaceae, Flacourtiaceae, Violaceae, Passifloraceae, Tamaricaceae, Elatinaceae, Begoniaceae, Cucurbitaceae, Lythraceae, Punicaceae, Onagraceae, Haloragaceae, Alangiaceae, Cornaceae, Araliaceae, Umbelliferae(Apiaceae), but is not limited thereto.

In an exemplary embodiment, the plant includes food crops such as rice, wheat, barley, corn, soybean, potato, wheat, red bean, oat, and sorghum; vegetable crops such as Arabidopsis thaliana, Chinese cabbage, radish, red pepper, strawberry, tomato, watermelon, cucumber, cabbage, oriental melon, pumpkin, welsh anion, anion, and carrot; crops for special use such as ginseng, tobacco, cotton, soilage, forage, sesame, sugar cane, sugar beet, Perilla sp., peanut, rape, grass, and castor-oil plant; fruit trees such as apple tree, pear tree, jujube tree, peach tree, kiwi fruit tree, grape tree, citrus fruit tree, persimmon tree, plum tree, apricot tree and banana tree; woody plants such as pine, palm oil, and eucalyptus; flowering crops such as rose, gladiolus, gerbera, carnation, chrysanthemum, lily and tulip; and fodder crops such as ryegrass, red clover, orchardgrass, alfalfa, tall fescue and perennial ryograss, but is not limited thereto. Specific examples of the plant may include dicotyledonous plants such as Arabidopsis thaliana, potato, eggplant, tobacco, red pepper, tomato, burdock, crown daisy, lettuce, balloon flower, spinach, chard, sweet potato, celery, carrot, water dropwort, parsley, Chinese cabbage, cabbage, radish, watermelon, oriental melon, cucumber, pumpkin, gourd, strawberry, soybean, mung beans, kidney bean, and pea, but are not limited thereto.

The alga, to which the present invention is applied, is not particularly limited to, but includes prokaryotic alga or eukaryotic alga. In some embodiments, the alga can be cyanobactera, green algae, red algae, brown algae, macroalgae or microalgae.

The cyanobacterium can be of the phyla Chroococcales (including Aphanocapsa, Aphanotece, Chamaesiphon, Chondrocystis, Chroococcus, Chroogloeocystis, Crocosphaera, Cyanobacterium, Cyanobium, Cyanodictyon, Cyanosarcina, Cyanothece, Dactylococcopsis, Gloeocapsa, Gloeothece, Halothece, Johannesbaptistia, Merismopedia, Microcystis, Radiocystis, Rhabdoderma, Snowella, Synechococcus, Synechocystis, Thermosynechococcus, Woronichinia), Gloeobacteria, Nostocales (including Microchaetaceae, Nostocaceae, Rivulariaceae, Scytonemataceae), Oscillatoriales (including Arthronema, Arthrospira, Blennothrix, Crinalium, Geitlerinema, Halomicronema, Halospirulina, Hydrocoleum, Jaaginema, Katagnymene, Komvophoron, Leptolyngbya, Limnothrix, Lyngbya, Microcoleus, Oscillatoria, Phormidium, Planktothricoides, Planktothrix, Plectonema, Pseudanabaena, Pseudophormidium, Schizothrix, Spirulina, Starria, Symploca, Trichodesmium, Tychonema), Pleurocapsales (including Chroococcidiopsis, Dermocarpa, Dermocarpella, Myxosarcina, Pleurocapsa, Solentia, Stanieria, Xenococcus), Prochlorales, or Stigonematales (including Capsosira, Chlorogloeopsis, Fischerella, Hapalosiphon, Mastigocladopsis, Mastigocladus, Nostochopsis, Stigonema, Symphyonema, Symphonemopsis, Umezakia, Westiellopsis).

The alga may further comprise a species of the Chlorophyta, Chlamydomonas, Volvacales, Dunaliella, Scenedesmus, Chlorella, or Hematococcm.

The alga may further comprise Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Amphiprora hyaline, Amphora spp., Chaetoceros muelleri, Navicula saprophila, Nitzschia communis, Scenedesmus dimorphus, Scenedesmus obliquus, Tetraselmis suecica, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Chlorella vulgaris, Haematococcus pluvialis, Neochloris oleoabundans, Synechococcus elongatus, Botryococcus braunii, Gloeobacter violaceus, Synechocystis, Thermosynechococcus elongatus, Nannochloropsis oculata, Nannochloropsis sauna, Nannochloropsis gaditana, Isochrysis galbana, Botryococcus sudeticus, Euglena gracilis, Neochloris oleoabundans, Nitzschia palea, Pleurochrysis carterae, Tetraselmis chuii, Pavlova spp., Aphanocapsa spp., Synechosystis spp. Nannochloris spp. It is however, clear for one skilled in the art that this list is not exclusive, but that various other genera and species can be used as well.

The plant or alga introduced with the herbicide-resistant PPO provided herein may exhibit resistance against two or more of PPO-inhibiting herbicides.

In an exemplary embodiment, therefore, two or more of PPO-inhibiting herbicides may be used sequentially or simultaneously to control weeds and/or undesired aquatic species.

For example, there are provided methods of controlling weeds in a cropland, the method including providing the cropland with a plant including the herbicide-resistant PPO protein or the gene encoding the corresponding peptides, and then applying two or more of the protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides to the cropland at an effective dosage sequentially or simultaneously.

Further, there are provided methods of controlling undesired aquatic species in a cultivation medium, the method including providing the cultivation medium with an alga including the herbicide-resistant PPO protein or the gene encoding the corresponding peptides, and then applying two or more of the protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides to the cultivation medium at an effective dosage sequentially or simultaneously.

Further, the herbicide-resistant PPO protein or gene provided herein may be used in combination of a second herbicide-resistant polypeptide or a gene encoding the corresponding peptides.

Therefore, the plant or alga introduced with the herbicide-resistant PPO provided herein may exhibit resistance against two or more of herbicides which are different from each other in mechanism of action. In the present invention, two or more of different herbicides including the PPO-inhibiting herbicide, which are different from each other in mechanism of action, may be used sequentially or simultaneously, thereby controlling weeds and/or undesired aquatic species. Hereinafter, the herbicide which is different from the PPO-inhibiting herbicide in the mechanism of action is called “second herbicide”.

For example, there are provided peptide or nucleotide composition for conferring or/and enhancing herbicide resistance on a plant or an alga, the composition including the above described herbicide-resistant PPO protein or a gene encoding the corresponding peptide; and the second herbicide-resistant polypeptide or gene encoding the corresponding peptide.

Further, there are provided a transformant, or a clone or progeny thereof having novel or/and enhanced herbicide resistance, the transformant, or the clone or progeny thereof including the above described herbicide-resistant PPO protein or a gene encoding the corresponding peptide; and the second herbicide-resistant polypeptide or a gene encoding the corresponding peptide.

Further, there are provided methods of preparing a plant or an alga having novel or/and enhanced herbicide resistance, the method including transforming an alga, a plant cell, protoplast, callus, hypocotyl, seed, cotyledon, shoot or plant with the above described herbicide-resistant PPO protein or a gene encoding the corresponding peptide; and the second herbicide-resistant polypeptide or a gene encoding the corresponding peptide.

Further, there are provided methods of controlling weeds in a cropland, the method including providing a cropland with the plant including the above described herbicide-resistant PPO protein or a gene encoding the corresponding peptide; and the second herbicide-resistant polypeptide or a gene encoding the corresponding peptide, and applying the protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicide and the second herbicide to the cropland at an effective dosage thereof, sequentially or simultaneously.

Further, there are provided methods of controlling undesired aquatic species in a cultivation medium, the method including providing a cultivation medium with the alga including the above described herbicide-resistant PPO protein or a gene encoding the corresponding peptide; and the second herbicide-resistant polypeptide or a gene encoding the corresponding peptide, and applying the protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicide and the second herbicide to the cultivation medium at an effective dosage thereof, sequentially or simultaneously.

In an exemplary embodiment, the plant or the alga may further include the second herbicide-resistant polypeptide or a gene encoding the corresponding peptide, thereby having novel or/and enhanced resistance against the second herbicide.

In another exemplary embodiment, the second herbicide may include cell division-inhibiting herbicides, photosynthesis-inhibiting herbicides, amino acid synthesis-inhibiting herbicides, plastid-inhibiting herbicides, cell membrane-inhibiting herbicides, and/or any combinations thereof, but is not limited thereto. The second herbicide may be exemplified by glyphosate, glufosinate, dicamba, 2,4-D(2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid), ALS (acetolactate synthase)-inhibiting herbicides (e.g., imidazolidinone, sulfonylurea, triazole pyrimidine, sulphonanilide, pyrimidine thiobenzoate, etc.), photosystem II-inhibiting herbicides, phenylure-based herbicides, plastid-inhibiting, herbicides, bromoxynil-based herbicides, and/or any combinations thereof, but is not limited thereto.

In still another exemplary embodiment, the second herbicide-resistant polypeptide may be exemplified selected from the group consisting of glyphosate herbicide-resistant EPSPS (glyphosate resistant 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase), GOX (glyphosate oxidase), GAT (glyphosate-N-acetyltransferase) or glyphosate decarboxylase; glufosinate herbicide-resistant PAT(phosphinothricin-N-acetyltransferase); dicamba herbicide-resistant DMO (monooxygenase); 2,4-D herbicide-resistant 2,4-D monooxygenase or AAD(aryloxyalkanoate Dioxygenase); ALS-inhibiting sulfonylurea-based herbicide-resistant ALS (Acetolactate Synthase), AHAS (acetohydroxyacid synthase), or AtAHASL (Acetohydroxyacid synthase Large Subunit); photosystem II-inhibiting herbicide-resistant photosystem II protein D1; phenylurea-based herbicide-resistant cytochrome P450; plastid-inhibiting herbicide-resistant HPPD(Hydroxylphenylpyruvate dioxygenase); bromoxynil herbicide-resistant nitrilase; and any combinations thereof, but is not limited thereto.

Further, the gene encoding the second herbicide-resistant polypeptide may be exemplified selected from the group consisting of glyphosate herbicide-resistant CP4 EPSPS, EPSPS(AG), MEPSPS, 2MEPSPS, GOXV247, GAT4601 or GAT4621 gene; glufosinate herbicide-resistant BAR, PAT or PAT(SYN) gene; dicamba herbicide-resistant DMO gene; 2,4-D herbicide-resistant AAD-1 or AAD-12 gene; ALS-inhibiting sulfonylurea-based herbicide-resistant ALS, GM-HRA, S4-HRA, ZM-HRA, CSR1, CSR1-1, CSR1-2, SURA or SURB; photosystem II-inhibiting herbicide-resistant PSBA gene; phenylurea herbicide-resistant CYP76B1 gene; isoxaflutole herbicide-resistant HPPDPF W336 gene; bromoxynil herbicide-resistant BXN gene; and any combinations thereof, but is not limited thereto.

This invention may be embodied in many different forms, and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout.

It will be understood that, although the terms “first,” “second,” “third” etc. may be used herein to describe various elements or components, these elements or components should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one element or component from another element or component.

The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting. As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” or “includes” and/or “including” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, elements or components, and/or groups thereof. As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items

While the invention has been described in detail in connection with a number of embodiments, the invention is not limited to such disclosed embodiments. Rather, the invention can be modified to incorporate any number of variations, alterations, substitutions or equivalent arrangements not heretofore described, but which are commensurate with the scope of the invention.

Effect of the Invention

An herbicide-resistant PPO provided herein is applied to plants or algae including commercial crops, and then selective control is performed using herbicide resistance traits and herbicides, thereby economically controlling weeds.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a photograph showing growth of Halothece sp. PCC 7418 strain which was cultured for 8 days in a CRBIP medium (Institut Pasteur, France) added without Tiafenacil or with 2 μM or 10 μM Tiafenacil.

FIG. 2 shows a structure of pACBB vector used in E. coli BT3(ΔPPO) of the present invention. eGFP was removed before use, when each PPO gene was cloned into the vector.

FIG. 3 is a photograph showing growth inhibition of respective BT3(ΔPPO) strains transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 (indicated by WT) and mutant AtPPO1 (indicated by MT) genes after spotting them onto agar medium containing 0˜25 μM Tiafenacil, and culturing them under light and dark conditions.

FIG. 4 is a photograph showing growth inhibition of respective BT3(ΔPPO) strains transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 (indicated by WT), mutant AtPPO1 (indicated by MT), CyPPO2 (indicated by 2), CyPPO4 (indicated by 4) and CyPPO8 (indicated by 8) genes on agar medium containing 0˜25 μM of a pyrimidinedione-based herbicide, Tiafenacil, Saflufenacil or Butafenacil, or an N-phenylphthalimide-based PPO herbicide, Flumioxazin. V indicates a strain prepared by transforming BT3(ΔPPO) with empty pACBB vector.

FIG. 5 is a photograph showing growth inhibition of respective BT3(ΔPPO) strains transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 (indicated by WT), mutant AtPPO1 (indicated by MT), CyPPO2 (indicated by 2), CyPPO4 (indicated by 4) and CyPPO8 (indicated by 8) genes on agar medium containing 0˜400 μM of a diphenyl ether-based PPO herbicide, Fomesafen, Acifluorfen or Oxyfluorfen. V indicates a strain prepared by transforming BT3(ΔPPO) with empty pACBB vector.

FIG. 6 is a photograph showing growth inhibition of respective BT3(ΔPPO) strains transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 (indicated by WT), mutant AtPPO1 (indicated by MT), CyPPO2 (indicated by 2), CyPPO4 (indicated by 4) and CyPPO8 (indicated by 8) genes on agar medium containing 0˜400 μM of a triazolinone-based PPO herbicide, Sulfentrazone, an oxizolidinedione-based PPO herbicide, Pentoxazone, a phenylpyrazole-based PPO herbicide, Pyraflufen-ethyl, an oxadiazole-based PPO herbicide, Oxadiazon, a thiadiazole-based PPO herbicide, Fluthiacet-methyl, or other PPO herbicide, Pyraclonil. V indicates a strain prepared by transforming BT3(ΔPPO) with empty pACBB vector.

FIG. 7 is a photograph showing growth inhibition of respective BT3(ΔPPO) strains transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 (indicated by WT), mutant AtPPO1 (indicated by MT), and CyPPO12 gene on agar medium containing 0˜00 μM of Tiafenacil, Saflufenacil, Flumioxazin, Fomesafen or Oxyfluorfen.

FIG. 8 is a photograph showing growth inhibition of respective BT3(ΔPPO) strains transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 (indicated by WT), mutant AtPPO1 (indicated by MT), and CyPPO12 gene on agar medium containing 0˜400 μM of Pyraflufen-ethyl, Oxadiazon, Sulfentrazone, Pentoxazone or Pyraclonil.

FIG. 9 is a graph showing growth inhibition of respective BT3(ΔPPO) strains transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 (indicated by WT), mutant AtPPO1 (indicated by MT), CyPPO2 and CyPPO4 genes in liquid LB medium containing 0˜100 μM of Tiafenacil over culture time.

FIG. 10 is a graph showing growth inhibition of respective BT3(ΔPPO) strains transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 (indicated by WT), mutant AtPPO1 (indicated by MT), CyPPO2, CyPPO4 and CyPPO8 genes in liquid LB medium containing 0˜100 μM of Saflufenacil over culture time.

FIG. 11 is a graph showing growth inhibition of respective BT3(ΔPPO) strains transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 (indicated by WT), mutant AtPPO1 (indicated by MT), CyPPO2, CyPPO4 and CyPPO8 genes in liquid LB medium containing 0˜100 μM of Fomesafen over culture time.

FIG. 12 is a schematic diagram showing a structure of a plant expression vector which was used to examine PPO gene expression in chloroplasts of tobacco leaves.

FIG. 13 shows the result of examining expressions of YFP, wild-type AtPPO1 (indicated by WT), CyPPO2, CyPPO4 and CyPPO8 genes in plant chloroplasts, after each of them was subcloned into the vector of FIG. 12, and then introduced into the plant.

FIG. 14 is a schematic diagram showing a structure of a vector for plant transformation, which was used for transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana with PPO gene.

FIG. 15 is the result of examining seed germination of respective Arabidopsis thaliana T2 seeds transformed with the mutant AtPPO1 (indicated by MT), CyPPO2 and CyPPO8 genes in 1/2 MS medium or 1/2 MS medium containing 70 nM of tiafenacil. The mutant AtPPO1 (indicated by MT) as a control was a seed(T2) which was transformed with the gene having resistance against a PPO-based herbicide by amino acid replacement.

FIG. 16 shows the result of Western blotting of each line of Arabidopsis thaliana T2 generation transformed with CyPPO2 gene to examine whether expression of CyPPO2 protein is maintained in the next generation. CyPPO2(R) indicates the herbicide-resistant transformant line, and CyPPO2(S) indicates the herbicide-sensitive transformant line. The lower panel of FIG. 16 shows the result of PCR to examine insertion of BAR gene into a binary vector.

FIG. 17 shows the result of Western blotting of each line of Arabidopsis thaliana T2 generation transformed with CyPPO8 gene to examine whether expression of CyPPO8 protein is maintained in the next generation. CyPPO8(R) indicates the herbicide-resistant transformant line, and CyPPO8(S) indicates the herbicide-sensitive transformant line. The lower panel of FIG. 17 shows the result of PCR to examine insertion of BAR gene into a binary vector.

FIG. 18 shows the result of examining growth of respective Arabidopsis thaliana T2 generations transformed with CyPPO2, CyPPO4 and CyPPO8 genes and a control mutant AtPPO1 (indicated by MT) gene at 7 days after spraying 1 μM Tiafenacil thereto. WT indicates the result of the wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana.

FIG. 19 shows the result of examining growth of respective Arabidopsis thaliana T2 generations transformed with CyPPO2, CyPPO4 and CyPPO8 genes and the control mutant AtPPO1 (indicated by MT) gene at 7 days after spraying 0.5 μM Tiafenacil, 1 μM Saflufenacil, or 3 μM Fomesafen thereto. WT indicates the result of the wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana.

FIG. 20 shows the result of culturing respective seeds of CyPPO2 and BAR gene-inserted Arabidopsis thaliana transformant and CyPPO8 and BAR gene-inserted Arabidopsis thaliana transformant in a glufosinate-added medium, Tiafenacil-added medium, or glufosinate and Tiafenacil-added medium.

FIG. 21 shows the result of culturing the seed of CyPPO2 or CyPPO8 gene-inserted Arabidopsis thaliana transformant in a Tiafenacil-added medium, Saflufenacil-added medium, or Tiafenacil and Saflufenacil-added medium.

FIG. 22 shows the result of examining a relationship between amino acid homology of CyPPO2, CyPPO4, or CyPPO8 protein and herbicide resistance, and is a photograph showing growth inhibition of respective BT3(ΔPPO) strains transformed with CyPPO2 amino acid sequence variant (indicated by 2M), CyPPO4 amino acid sequence variant (indicated by 4M) and CyPPO8 amino acid sequence variant (indicated by 8M) genes in agar media with varying concentrations of Tiafenacil, Saflufenacil and Butafenacil. As a control group to determine growth inhibition, wild-type AtPPO1 (indicated by WT) and Mutant AtPPO1 (indicated by MT) were used.

FIG. 23 is a photograph showing growth inhibition of respective BT3(ΔPPO) strains transformed with CyPPO2 amino acid sequence variant (indicated by 2M), CyPPO4 amino acid sequence variant (indicated by 4M) and CyPPO8 amino acid sequence variant (indicated by 8M) genes in agar media with varying concentrations of Acifluorfen, Oxyfluorfen and Fomesafen. As a control group to determine growth inhibition, wild-type AtPPO1 (indicated by WT) and Mutant AtPPO1 (indicated by MT) were used.

FIG. 24 is a photograph showing growth inhibition of respective BT3(ΔPPO) strains transformed with CyPPO2 amino acid sequence variant (indicated by 2M), CyPPO4 amino acid sequence variant (indicated by 4M) and CyPPO8 amino acid sequence variant (indicated by 8M) genes in agar media with varying concentrations of Sulfentrazone, Oxadiazon, Pentoxazone and Pyraclonil. As a control group to determine growth inhibition, wild-type AtPPO1 (indicated by WT) and Mutant AtPPO1 (indicated by MT) were used.

FIG. 25 is a photograph showing growth inhibition of respective BT3(ΔPPO) strains transformed with CyPPO2 amino acid sequence variant (indicated by 2M), CyPPO4 amino acid sequence variant (indicated by 4M) and CyPPO8 amino acid sequence variant (indicated by 8M) genes in agar media with varying concentrations of Fluthiacet-methyl, Pyraflufen-ethyl and Flumioxazin. As a control group to determine growth inhibition, wild-type AtPPO1 (indicated by WT) and Mutant AtPPO1 (indicated by MT) were used.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail with reference to Examples. However, these Examples are for illustrative purposes only, and the invention is not intended to be limited by these Examples.

Example 1. Isolation of PPO Gene from Prokaryote

Oscillatoria nigro-viridis PCC 7112, Lyngbya sp. PCC 8106 strain, and Halothece sp. PCC 7418 strain were provided by the Institut Pasteur, (France), and PPO genes were isolated therefrom by PCR using primers of Table 1. Genomic DNA was isolated from each strain, and PPO gene was isolated and amplified using the primers of Table 1. The sequence of the PPO gene of Microcoleus vaginatus (GenScript) was synthesized by codon usage optimization of Arabidopsis thaliana using Genbank database information and amplified using primers of Table 1. 50 μl of PCR reaction mixture was prepared by mixing 1 μl of each template (genomic DNA of each strain), 5 μl of 10× buffer, 2 μl of dNTP mixture (each 10 mM), 3 μl of a forward primer (10 μM), 3 μl of a reverse primer (10 μM), 35.5 μl of DDW, and 0.5 μl of Pfu-X (Solgent, 2.5 unit/μl) or EF-taq (Solgent, 2.5 u/μl), and amplification was performed under conditions of at 94° C. for 4 minutes, and 30 cycles (at 94° C. for 30 seconds, at 56° C. for 30 seconds and at 72° C. for 1.5 minutes), at 72° C. for 5 minutes and at 4° C. for 5 minutes. PPO isolated from Oscillatoria nigro-viridis PCC 7112 was designated as CyPPO2, PPO isolated from Lyngbya sp. PCC 8106 strain was designated as CyPPO4, PPO isolated from Halothece sp. PCC 7418 strain was designated as CyPPO8, and PPO isolated from Microcoleus vaginatus was designated as CyPPO12.

Further, respective amino acid sequences and nucleotide sequences of CyPPO2, CyPPO4, CyPPO8 and CyPPO12 were examined, and represented by SEQ ID NOS: 1 to 8, and in particular, the amino acid sequence of CyPPO2 showed 94% sequence homology to that of CyPPO12.

TABLE 1 SEQ ID Strain Primer Sequence NO: Oscillatoria PCC7112_BmHIF ccccggatccATGGAACTATTAGATACCTTGATT 18 nigro-viridis GTGGG PCC 7112 PCC7112_StuIR cccaggcctGATCGATCGAGTATCTGATTG 19 Halothece sp. PCC7418_BmHIF ccccggatccATGATAGATACTTTAATTGTGGG 20 PCC 7418 PCC7418_XhoIR ccccctcgagACCCAAATAATCTAACACGG 21 Lyngbya sp. PCC PCC8106_BglIIF ccccagatctATGACTCACGTACTCGATAG 22 8106 PCC8106_XhoIR ccccctcgagTTGACCCAAAAAACTGAGAATTTC 23 Microcoleus CyPPO12_BamHIF CCCCGGATCCATGGAACTCTTGGATACTCT 24 vaginatus CyPPO12_XhoIR CCCCCTCGAGGATTGACCTGGTATCAGATT 25

Example 2. Test of Herbicide Resistance of Halothece sp. PCC 7418 Strain

Halothece sp. PCC 7418 strain was cultured in CRBIP Medium 1538 (Institut Pasteur, France). CRBIP Medium 1538 is a mixed medium of ASNIII and Turks Island Salts 4× at a ratio of 1:1 (v/v), and ASNIII medium was composed of 25.0 g of NaCl, 3.5 g of MgSO₄.7H₂O, 2.0 g of MgCl₂.6H₂O, 0.5 g of KCl, 0.5 g of CaCl₂.2H₂O, 0.75 g of NaNO₃, 0.02 g of K₂HPO₄.3H₂O, 0.04 g of NaCO₃, 2.5 ml of ammonium iron (III) citrate/citric acid monohydrate solution [a mixture of 300 mg of ammonium iron (III) citrate, 300 mg of citric acid monohydrate, and 250 ml of distilled water], 2.5 ml of magnesium titriplex dihydrate solution [a mixture of 0.1 g of Mg EDTA and 500 ml of distilled water], 1 ml of trace metal A5+Co [a mixture of 2.86 g of H₃BO₃, 1.81 g of MnCl₂.4H₂O, 0.222 g of ZnSO₄.7H₂O, 0.39 g of NaMoO₄.2H₂O, 0.079 g of CuSO₄.5H₂O, 0.049 g of Co(NO₃)₂.6H₂O and 1000 ml of distilled water], and 1000 ml of distilled water. Turks Island Salts 4× was composed of 112 g of NaCl, 2.68 g of KCl, 22 g of MgCl₂.6 H₂O, 27.7 g of MgSO₄.7 H₂O, 5.8 g of CaCl₂.2 H₂O, and 1000 ml of distilled water. ASNIII medium and Tursk Island Salts 4× were autoclaved at 120° C. for 20 minutes, respectively and then mixed at a ratio of 1:1 (v/v).

5 ml of the above culture medium was added to a test tube, and 2 or 10 μM of Tiafenacil was added thereto or not. The seed-cultured Halothece sp. PCC 7418 strain was added to each test tube at an equal volume and growth of the strain was examined for 8 days. As a result, growth of Halothece sp. PCC 7418 strain was maintained even at 8 days after treatment of 10 μM of Tiafenacil, indicating that this strain has herbicide resistance (FIG. 1).

Example 3. Test of Herbicide Resistance of CyPPO2, CyPPO4, CyPPO8 and CyPPO12 in PPO-Deficient E. coli (Agar Medium)

To test herbicide resistance of CyPPO2, CyPPO4, CyPPO8 and CyPPO12 isolated in Example 1, PPO-deficient BT3 E. coli [hereinafter, referred to as BT3(ΔPPO)] was transformed with CyPPO2, CyPPO4, CyPPO8 or CyPPO12 gene, respectively and then cultured in the presence of herbicides to examine growth inhibition of the transformed E. coli. As a negative control, Arabidopsis thaliana-derived wild-type PPO (wild-type AtPPO1) was used, and wild-type AtPPO1 has sensitivity to PPO-based herbicides and its sequence information is available in GeneBank accession no. AX084732 (a nucleotide sequence of the gene is represented by SEQ ID NO: 10, and an amino acid sequence thereof is represented by SEQ ID NO: 9). As a positive control, Mutant AtPPO1 was used, in which amino acid replacements of Y426M (replacement of tyrosine by methionine at position 426) and 5305L (replacement of serine by leucine at position 305) occur in the amino acid sequence of the wild-type AtPPO1 (an amino acid sequence is represented by SEQ ID NO: 11) (Li X, Volrath S L., N D B. G., Chilcott C E, Johnson M A, Ward E R, Law M D (2003) Development of protoporphyrinogen oxidase as an efficient selection marker for agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of maize. Plant physiology 133:736-747).

BT3(ΔPPO) strain was provided by Hokkaido University (Japan) and it is an E. coli strain which is deficient in hemG-type PPO and has Kanamycin resistance (Watanabe et al., (2001) Dual targeting of spinach protoporphyrinogen oxidase II to mitochondria and chloroplasts by alternative use of two in-frame inhibition codons. JBC 20474˜20481).

3-1. Preparation of Experimental Materials and Instruments

HVE-50 autoclave from Hirayama, HS2100A electronic scale from Hansung Instrument, CB-30V clean bench from Jeio Tech, JSI-200CL incubator from JSR, 1210 type UV-visible spectrophotometer from Thermo Fisher Scientific, MQ-200 photometer from Apogee, and Bio-Rad MyCycler as PCR machine were used. The autoclave was used under conditions of 121° C. and 15 minutes, and the incubator was used at 37° C. with lighting of 160˜200 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ for a culture time of 14˜20 hours. LB medium (10 g/L of Bacto-Tryptone, 5 g/L of Yeast extract, 10 g/L of sodium chloride, 15 g/L of Bacto agar) and an antibiotic Chloramphenicol (Duchefa) were used. The herbicides used in the experiment are given in the following Table.

TABLE 2 Herbicide Chemical family (original name) Manufacturer/Supplier Pyrimidinedione Tiafenacil Dongbu Farm Hannong Co., Ltd./Dongbu Farm Hannong Co., Ltd. Saflufenacil BASF/Sigma Butafenacil Syngenta/Sigma Diphenyl ether Fomesafen Syngenta/Sigma Acifluorfen United Phosphorus/Supelco Oxyfluorfen Dow/Sigma N-phenylphthalimides Flumioxazin Sumitomo/Sigma Triazolinones Sulfentrazone FMC/Waka Oxazolidinediones Pentoxazone Kaken/Sigma Phenylpyrazoles Pyraflufen-ethyl Nihon Nohyaky/Sigma Others Pyraclonil Kyoyu Agri/Sigma Oxadiazoles Oxadiazon Bayer/Sigma Thiadiazoles Fluthiacet-methyl FMC/Sigma

3-2. Experimental Method

To clone each of the CyPPO2, CyPPO4, CyPPO8 and CyPPO12 genes isolated and amplified in Example 1 into pACBB (its structure is shown in FIG. 2), 10 μl of a solution containing 4 μl of each PPO gene, 3.5 μl of pACBB vector, 1 μl of 10× buffer A, 1 μl of 10× buffer B, 1 μl of ligase (RBC, 3 unit/μl) was prepared and allowed to react at 22° C. for 30 minutes. The reaction solution was added to 100 μl of DH5 alpha competent cells, and allowed to react on ice for 20 minutes and then left at 42° C. for 40 seconds. Thereafter, the cells were left on ice for 2 minutes, and then 1 ml of LB broth was added thereto, followed by incubation with shaking at 37° C. for 1 hour. The strains having each gene insert in the culture medium were harvested, and then cultured on LB agar medium containing chloramphenicol.

For seed culture of E. coli transformed with respective genes, single colonies thereof were cultured in 3 ml of LB broth containing chloramphenicol overnight, and each 100 μl thereof was sub-cultured in 3 ml of fresh LB broth until absorbance (OD₆₀₀) reached 0.5˜1. They were diluted with LB broth to absorbance (OD₆₀₀) of 0.5. 10-fold dilution of this diluted solution was performed with LB broth five times. Next, 10 μl of the diluted solution of the transformed E. coli culture was dropped on LB agar medium (petri dish) containing chloramphenicol and a variety of herbicide stocks at different concentrations (0˜400 μM). The LB agar plates were incubated at 37° C. At 16˜20 hours after culture, growth inhibition was examined with the naked eye. Further, growth inhibition of the strains cultured in a medium containing Tiafenacil was examined under light (lighting of 169 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹) and dark conditions.

3-3. Experimental Result

FIGS. 4 to 6 show the results of examining herbicide resistance of CyPPO2, CyPPO4 and CyPPO8, and FIGS. 7 and 8 show the results of examining herbicide resistance of CyPPO12.

As shown in FIG. 3, growth of the strain transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 was inhibited in the medium containing Tiafenacil under light and dark conditions, and stronger growth inhibition was observed under light condition than dark condition. For example, growth of the strain transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 was almost completely inhibited at 1 μM of Tiafenacil under light condition, but its growth was rather maintained under dark condition. However, growth was completely inhibited at 5 μM or higher of Tiafenacil under both light and dark conditions. As such, growth of the strain transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 was inhibited in a Tiafenacil concentration-dependent manner, indicating herbicide sensitivity. Growth inhibition of the strain transformed with the mutant AtPPO1 was not observed even at 25 μM of Tiafenacil, indicating herbicide resistance.

Therefore, the wild-type AtPPO1 was employed as a reference for herbicide-sensitive PPO, and the mutant AtPPO1 was employed as a reference for herbicide-resistant PPO, and herbicide resistance of CyPPO2, CyPPO4 or CyPPO8 against the representative PPO families was examined.

FIG. 4 shows the results after treatment with varying concentrations of representative pyrimidinedione-based PPO herbicides, Tiafenacil, Saflufenacil and Butafenacil, and a representative N-phenylphthalimide-based PPO herbicide, Flumioxazin. Upon treatment of Tiafenacil and Saflufenacil, growth inhibitions of the strain transformed with the mutant AtPPO1, the strain transformed with CyPPO2, the strain transformed with CyPPO4, and the strain transformed with CyPPO8 were hardly observed even at 25 μM of Tiafenacil or Saflufenacil. Upon treatment of Butafenacil, growth inhibitions of the strain transformed with the mutant AtPPO1, the strain transformed with CyPPO2, and the strain transformed with CyPPO8 were hardly observed even at 25 μM of Butafenacil. Upon treatment of Flumioxazin, growth inhibitions of the strain transformed with CyPPO2, the strain transformed with CyPPO4, and the strain transformed with CyPPO8 were hardly observed even at 25 μM of Flumioxazin. Upon treatment of each of the four herbicides, growth inhibition of the strain transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 began at 0.5 μM and it hardly grew at 5 μM or higher.

FIG. 5 shows the results after treatment with varying concentrations of representative diphenyl ether-based PPO herbicides, Fomesafen, Acifluorfen and Oxyfluorfen. Upon treatment of Fomesafen, no growth inhibition of the strain transformed with the mutant AtPPO1 was observed by 25 μM, and growth inhibitions of the strain transformed with CyPPO2, the strain transformed with CyPPO4, and the strain transformed with CyPPO8 were hardly observed even at 400 μM of Fomesafen. Upon treatment of Acifluorfen, growth inhibitions of the strain transformed with CyPPO2, the strain transformed with CyPPO4, and the strain transformed with CyPPO8 were hardly observed even at 400 μM of Acifluorfen. Upon treatment of Oxyfluorfen, growth inhibitions of the strain transformed with CyPPO2, the strain transformed with CyPPO4, and the strain transformed with CyPPO8 were hardly observed even at 400 μM of Oxyfluorfen. Upon treatment of each of the three herbicides, the strain transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 hardly grew at 5 μM or higher.

FIG. 6 shows the results after treatment with varying concentrations of a representative triazolinone-based PPO herbicide Sulfentrazone, a representative oxazolidinedione-based PPO herbicide Pentoxazone, a representative phenylpyrazole-based PPO herbicide Pyraflufen-ethyl, a representative oxadiazole-based PPO herbicide Oxadiazon, a representative thiadiazole-based PPO herbicide Fluthiacet-methyl, and other PPO herbicide Pyraclonil. Upon treatment of Sulfentrazone, growth inhibitions of the strain transformed with CyPPO2, the strain transformed with CyPPO4, and the strain transformed with CyPPO8 were hardly observed even at 400 μM of Sulfentrazone. Upon treatment of Pentoxazone, Pyraflufen-ethyl, Oxadiazon, Fluthiacet-methyl, and Pyraclonil, growth inhibitions of the strain transformed with CyPPO2 and the strain transformed with CyPPO8 were hardly observed even at 400 μM of Oxyfluorfen. Upon treatment of each of the seven herbicides, the strain transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 hardly grew at 5 μM or higher.

FIG. 7 shows the results of examining herbicide resistance of CyPPO12 upon treatment of Tiafenacil, Saflufenacil, Flumioxazin, Fomesafen and Oxyfluorfen. Growth inhibition of the strain transformed with CyPPO12 was hardly observed even at each 25 μM of Tiafenacil, Saflufenacil, Flumioxazin, Fomesafen and Oxyfluorfen, and growth inhibition thereof was hardly observed even at 400 μM of Fomesafen or Oxyfluorfen. Upon treatment of Oxyfluorfen, growth inhibition of the strain transformed with the mutant AtPPO1 began at 5 μM. Growth inhibition thereof was hardly observed even at 25 μM of other herbicides. In contrast, growth inhibition of the strain transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 began at each 0.5 μM of the four herbicides excluding Fomesafen, and it hardly grew at 5 μM or higher. Upon treatment of Fomesafen, growth inhibition of the strain transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 was observed at 5 μM.

FIG. 8 shows the results of examining herbicide resistance of CyPPO12 upon treatment of Pyraflufen-ethyl, Oxadiazon, Sulfentrazone, Pentoxazone and Pyraclonil. No growth inhibitions of the strain transformed with the mutant AtPPO1 and the strain transformed with CyPPO12 were observed even at 25 μM, and no growth inhibitions thereof were also observed even at each 400 μM of the four herbicides excluding Sulfentrazone. In contrast, upon treatment of Pyraflufen-ethyl, Oxadiazon, Sulfentrazone, or Pyraclonil, growth inhibition of the strain transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 began at 0.5 μM. Upon treatment of Pyraclonil, growth inhibition thereof began at 5 μM and it hardly grew at 25 μM.

Example 4. Test of Herbicide Resistance of CyPPO2, CyPPO4 and CyPPO8 in PPO-Deficient E. coli (LB Broth Medium)

In Example 3, herbicide resistance of respective BT3(ΔPPO) strains transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1, mutant AtPPO1, CyPPO2, CyPPO4 or CyPPO8 gene was investigated on agar media containing different herbicides, and in this Example, herbicide resistance of the strains was investigated in LB liquid media containing different herbicides.

4-1. Preparation of Experimental Materials and Instruments

HV-50 autoclave from Hirayama, HS2100A electronic scale from Hansung Instrument, CB-30V clean bench from Jeio Tech, JSI-200CL incubator from JSR, MQ-200 photometer from Apogee, and 1210 type UV-visible spectrophotometer from Thermo Fisher Scientific were used. The autoclave was used under conditions of 121° C. and 15 minutes, and the incubator was used at 37° C. with lighting of 160˜200 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹ for a culture time of 13.5 hours. The UV-visible spectrophotometer was used at 600 nm.

Tiafenacil (M.W. 511.87 g/mol), Saflufenacil (M.W. 500.85 g/mol), and Fomesafen (M.W. 438.76 g/mol) used in the experiment were purchased from Dongbu Farm Hannong Co., Ltd, Sigma, and Sigma, respectively. These drugs were prepared at 200 mM concentration in 100% acetone, and stored at −20° C., respectively. Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (10 g/L of Bacto-Tryptone, 5 g/L of Yeast extract, 10 g/L of sodium chloride) and an antibiotic Chloramphenicol (Duchefa) were used.

4-2. Experimental Method

For seed culture of E. coli transformed with respective genes, single colonies thereof were cultured in 3 ml of LB broth containing chloramphenicol for 12 hours, and they were diluted with LB broth to absorbance (OD₆₀₀) of 1.5. Next, chloramphenicol and 500 μl of the seed culture of the transformed E. coli were added to 250 ml of LB liquid medium, and 50 ml of the culture was added to each 250 ml-flask. Each flask was treated with varying concentrations (0, 10 μM, 50 μM, 100 μM) of herbicide stocks (Tiafenacil, Saflufenacil, Fomesafen), and then incubated at 37° C. and 200 rpm. Absorbance (OD₆₀₀) was measured using a spectrophotometer every 1.5 hours. The experiment was repeated three times, and mean values thereof were given in a graph. Error bars represent standard error of three repeats.

4-3. Experimental Result

The wild-type AtPPO1 was employed as a reference for herbicide-sensitive PPO, and the mutant AtPPO1 was employed as a reference for herbicide-resistant PPO.

The result of Tiafenacil treatment is shown in FIG. 9.

The strain transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 hardly grew at 10 μM of Tiafenacil or higher, whereas the strain transformed with the mutant AtPPO1 grew at 10 μM of Tiafenacil, but growth inhibition thereof was observed at 50 μM of Tiafenacil or higher. Further, the strain transformed with CyPPO2 and the strain transformed with CyPPO4 normally grew by 100 μM of Tiafenacil.

The result of Saflufenacil treatment is shown in FIG. 10.

In all the transformed strains, the presence or absence of resistance was similar to the result of Tiafenacil treatment, but high resistance was observed in the strains treated with Saflufenacil, compared to those treated with Tiafenacil. The strain transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 hardly grew at 10 μM of Saflufenacil or higher, whereas the strain transformed with the mutant AtPPO1, the strain transformed with CyPPO2, the strain transformed with CyPPO4, and the strain transformed with CyPPO8 normally grew by 100 μm.

The result of Fomesafen treatment is shown in FIG. 11.

Growth inhibition of the strain transformed with the wild-type AtPPO1 began at 50 μM, whereas the strain transformed with the mutant AtPPO1, the strain transformed with CyPPO2, the strain transformed with CyPPO4, and the strain transformed with CyPPO8 normally grew by 100 μM.

Example 5. Expression of CyPPO2, CyPPO4 and CyPPO8 in Plant

Experiments were performed to express CyPPO2, CyPPO4 and CyPPO8 in plants, of which resistance against various PPO herbicides had been demonstrated in Examples 3 and 4, and fluorescent protein (yellow fluorescent protein, YFP) was used to confirm expressions of the PPO proteins.

5-1. Experimental Method

To prepare Agrobacterium competent cells, Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 strain (Korea Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology) was cultured in 5 ml of LB media at 30° C. and 200 rpm for 12 hours. This culture broth was added to 200 ml of LB media, and then cultured at 30° C. and 200 rpm for 3˜4 hours, followed by centrifugation at 3000 g, 4° C. for 20 minutes. The pellet was washed with sterile distilled water, and then resuspended in 20 ml LB media. 200 μL of aliquot thereof was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored in a deep freezer.

To prepare respective vectors which were cloned with the wild-type AtPPO1, CyPPO2, CyPPO4 and CyPPO8 genes, a vector containing a CaMV 35S promoter, YFP and NOS terminator was treated with XbaI and XhoI restriction enzymes, and a transit peptide gene (SEQ ID NO: 26) amplified by PCR was treated with XbaI and XhoI restriction enzymes, and then the vector and the transit peptide gene were ligated with each other to insert the transit peptide which is involved in transition of the chloroplast into the vector. Further, XhoI and BamHI restriction enzymes were used to digest respective PPO genes (wild-type AtPPO1, CyPPO2, CyPPO4 and CyPPO8 genes) and the vector, and then ligated with each other to insert the respective PPO genes into the vector. As a result, the transit peptide was linked to 5′-end of the PPO gene and YFP gene was linked to 3′-end thereof. A schematic diagram of the final vector is shown in FIG. 12.

Next, for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, Agrobacterium competent cells prepared the above were thawed on ice, and then mixed with 3˜5 μL of the vectors harboring the respective PPO genes, followed by snap freezing in liquid nitrogen for 2˜3 minutes. Thereafter, the cells were thawed at 37° C. for 5 minutes, 1 ml of LB medium was added thereto, and incubated at 30° C. for 2 hours. Each resulting culture was plated on LB/spectinomycin medium and incubated at 30° C. for 2 days.

To inoculate tobacco leaves with Agrobacterium, Agrobacterium single colonies transformed with respective PPO-inserted vectors were cultured in LB/spectinomycin media at 30° C., 200 rpm for 12 hours, and centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 2 minutes. The resulting pellets were resuspended in 10 mM MgCl₂, respectively. After their absorbance (OD₆₀₀) was adjusted to 0.5, 200 μM acetosyringone was added and stored at room temperature for 2 hours. Agrobacterium was infiltrated into tobacco leaves normally grown using a 1 ml-syringe, and cultured for 2-5 days.

Next, to isolate protoplasts of tobacco leaves, an enzyme solution was prepared as in the composition of Table 3 or 5.

TABLE 3 Composition Content CPW stock A (100x) 5 ml CPW stock B (10x) 50 ml Mannitol 45 g MES 533 mg Viscozyme (Novozymes; KWN00019; 5 ml 700 EGU/g Cellulase) Celluclast (Novozymes; CCN03123; 2.5 ml 100 FBG/g Beta-glucanase) pectinEX (Novozymes; KJN01013) 2.5 ml DDW up to 500 ml

pH of the above solution was adjusted to 5.8, and sterilized using a filter having a 0.22 μm-pore size.

TABLE 4 CPW stock A (100x) CaCl₂•2H₂O 1460 mg/L CPW stock B (10x) KH₂PO₄ 27.2 mg/L KNO₃ 101 mg/L MgSO₄•7H₂O 246 mg/L KI 0.16 mg/L CuSO₄•5H₂O 0.025 mg/L pH 5.8

TABLE 5 Composition Content Mannitol 1 g 200 mM MES (pH 5.7) 150 μL viscozyme 100 μL celluclast 50 μL pectinEX 50 μL 1M CaCl₂ 70 μL DDW up to 10 ml

The tobacco leaves were cut into strips with a razor blade, and the leaf strips were suspended in the prepared enzyme solution, and covered with aluminum foil and stirred at room temperature at 40-50 rpm for 3-5 hours. A microscope (Carl Zeiss Observer Z1) and a biomaterial correlation analysis system (Zeiss LSM710) were used to examine protoplast cells with three types of filters, DIC, YFP and rhodamine. Images were captured using an imaging tool, and then processed using a ZEN lite 2012 (Carl Zeiss) program.

Fluorescent protein (YFP) expressed with the CyPPO2, CyPPO4 or CyPPO8 protein was examined by Western blotting. To this end, the samples were frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen, and then disrupted using a micropestle. IP buffer[50 mM Tris-Cl(pH7.5), 75 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM DTT, 1× protease inhibitor] (40 μL for large well) was added and vortexed, and then left on ice for 10 minutes or longer. After centrifugation at 4° C. for 10 minutes, the supernatant was transferred to a new 1.5 ml-tube. A protein loading dye was added thereto, boiled at 100° C. for 5 minutes, and then left on ice. After centrifugation, the supernatant was used. For electrophoresis, a protein extract solution was loaded on a 7.5% SDS-PAGE gel, and proteins were separated at 100 V for a stacking gel and at 150 V for a separating gel. The electrophoresed proteins were transferred onto a PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride) membrane, and blocked with a blocking buffer (4% skim milk powder, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 0.15M NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20, pH 7.5) for 1 hour. Then, anti-GFP antibody (HRP-conjugated) (SantaCruz) was added at 1/2000 dilution, and reacted at room temperature for 2 hours. After antibody reaction, the membrane was washed with PBS-T (phosphate buffered saline-Tween) buffer for 10 minutes three times, and 500 μL of ECL (electrochemiluminescence) solution (buffer composition or supplier: Bio-Rad) was sprayed thereon and left for 1 minute. The membrane was covered with an OHP film, exposed to X-ray film, and then the film was developed.

5-2. Experimental Result

The results of examining expressions of respective wild-type AtPPO1, CyPPO2, CyPPO4 and CyPPO8 genes after introduction into plants are shown in FIG. 13. Formation of Agrobacterium colonies was observed in the respective plants transformed with the PPO genes. Targeting of the negative control YFP protein to chloroplasts was not observed and expression thereof was observed in the cytoplasm and nucleus. The merged image of the PPO protein and chlorophyll autofluorescence showed that fluorescence signals were overlapped with each other, indicating that targeting to chloroplasts occurs by cTP (chloroplast transit peptide) which is linked to N-terminus for the purpose of targeting to the chloroplast.

Example 6. Preparation of Plant Transformation Vector and Transformant

For plant transformation selection, a binary vector harboring ORF of BAR gene (glufosinate resistance gene) and ORF of respective CyPPO2, CyPPO4 or CyPPO8 gene was prepared and used. BAR gene was used to examine cross-treatment effects of other herbicides which have different mechanism of action from that of the PPO-based herbicides. This gene was also used to examine whether stable inheritance occurred in the next generation. To express BAR gene, a NOS promoter was used, and an E9 terminator was used to terminate transcription. Meanwhile, for expression induction of CyPPO2, CyPPO4 and CyPPO8 in plants, a CaMV35S promoter was used, and for targeting of the proteins to chloroplasts, a transit peptide (TP) region of AtPPO1 gene was inserted using XbaI and XhoI restriction enzymes. Further, to confirm the expressed proteins, hemagglutinin (HA) tag was inserted into 3′-end using BamHI and SacI restriction enzymes. The transit peptide region inserted into the vector is represented by SEQ ID NO: 27 and the inserted HA tag sequence is represented by SEQ ID NO: 28. The CyPPO2 and CyPPO8 genes were inserted between the transit peptide and HA tag using XhoI and BamHI restriction enzymes, and the NOS terminator was inserted behind HA tag to induce transcription termination of PPO gene. A schematic diagram showing the structure of the plant transformation binary vector is shown in FIG. 14.

Meanwhile, the plant transformant was prepared as follows. First, transformed Agrobacterium was selected in an antibiotic medium and then colonies were cultured in a liquid medium. Agrobacterium cells were harvested and suspended in a solution containing 5% sucrose and 0.05% Silwet L-77. Absorbance (OD₆₀₀) was adjusted to 0.8, and then a floral organ of Arabidopsis thaliana grown for about 5-6 weeks was put in the Agrobacterium solution. To maintain humidity, the pot was covered with a plastic bag, and left for a day in the dark. Arabidopsis thaliana inoculated with Agrobacterium was further grown for 1-2 months, and seeds were matured, and then harvested. Because seeds harvested from the transformed plant were a mixture of transformed and non-transformed seeds, a process of selecting transformed seeds from the harvested seeds is required.

Accordingly, BAR gene which was inserted for selection of transformed individuals during the vector preparation was used to select transformants (transformants were selected using glufosinate), which were transplanted to soil and grown to obtain a T1 plant.

To examine resistance of the transplanted T1 plants against PPO-based herbicides, the plants were grown for about 3-4 weeks, and then treated with herbicides prior to flower stalk elongation. Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Col-0 was found to be killed when treated with 2-3 ml of 1 μM tiafenacil (+0.05% Silwet L-77) per plant. Therefore, 1 μM tiafenacil was evenly applied at an amount proper for the number of plant individuals. After 7 days, resistance of the transformants against PPO-based herbicides was examined. The plants that showed resistance and thus survived were continuously grown, and their seeds (T2 seed) were harvested, and the T2 seeds were cultured in 1/2 MS medium for a week, and then transplanted to soil to obtain a T2 plant.

Example 7. Germination Test

To examine tiafenacil resistance of T2 generation seeds which survived under treatment of 1 μM tiafenacil, among the CyPPO2 and CyPPO8 transformants, Arabidopsis thaliana seeds were sown in 1/2 MS medium (1.125 g/L of MS salt, 10 g/L of sucrose, 7 g/L of Agar) containing 70 nM tiafenacil. The wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0; Columbia-0 ecotype) showed a reduced seed germination in 1/2 MS medium containing 50 nM tiafenacil, and Col-0 showed no normal seed germination and was killed in 1/2 MS medium containing 70 nM tiafenacil. Therefore, survival under 70 nM tiafenacil means that a plant has resistance against tiafenacil.

As a result, as shown in FIG. 5, no. 1 and 49 among T2 generation lines of the CyPPO2 transformants showed germination, and no. 6, 16 and 40 among T2 generation lines of the CyPPO8 transformants showed germination in 1/2 MS medium containing 70 nM tiafenacil. Further, the wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana(Col-0) seed used as a negative control showed no germination in 1/2 MS medium containing 70 nM tiafenacil. The mutant AtPPO1 transformant used as a positive control showed germination even in 1/2 MS medium containing 70 nM tiafenacil.

Example 8. Inheritance Test 8-1. Examination of Segregation Ratio of T2 Generation Seed

The herbicide resistance trait was observed in the next generation of the transformed Arabidopsis thaliana, and therefore, in order to determine inheritance, segregation ratios of BAR gene-resistant and sensitive T2 seeds were determined in each line.

In the case of the CyPPO2 transformant, a segregation ratio close to 3:1 was obtained in line no. 10, 20, 38, and 40 among 10 lines, indicating that a single copy of transgene was integrated into the genome, and segregated and expressed according to the Mendelian. The remaining 6 lines showed no segregation ratio of 3:1, implying double copy or greater.

In the case of the CyPPO8 transformant, a segregation ratio close to 3:1 was obtained in line no. 6, 16, and 40 among 5 lines, indicating that a single copy of transgene was integrated into the genome, and segregated and expressed according to the Mendelian. The remaining 2 lines showed a segregation ratio lower than 3:1.

TABLE 6 CyPPO2-HA transformant (T2) Line no. Segregation ratio 1 4.56:1 8 1.56:1 10 2.85:1 20 2.70:1 23  1.5:1 30  1.7:1 35 2.03:1 38 2.57:1 40 3.17:1 49 2.41:1

TABLE 7 CyPPO8-HA transformant (T2) Line no. Segregation ratio 6 2.57:1 16 2.85:1 23 2.23:1 38 2.03:1 40 2.85:1

8-2. Examination of CyPPO2 and CyPPO8 Protein Expressions in Herbicide-Resistant T2 Generation Seed

To examine whether CyPPO2 and CyPPO8 protein expressions are maintained in the next generation, proteins were extracted from each T2 generation line of transformants, followed by Western blotting. To detect the amounts of HA-tagged PPO proteins, proteins were extracted from about 100 mg of Arabidopsis thaliana leaf, followed by electrophoresis. The proteins were transferred onto a PVDF membrane, and then Western blotting was performed using anti-HA antibody. 1 μM tiafenacil was sprayed onto T1 generation plants. Plants that survived were classified as resistant, and plants that were killed were classified as sensitive.

In the case of CyPPO2 transformant, PPO proteins were detected in line no. 8, 23, 30, 38, 40 and 49 which showed resistance upon spraying herbicides thereto, and not detected in sensitive lines (FIG. 16). In the case of CyPPO8 transformant, PPO proteins were detected in line no. 6, 23, 38, and 40 having herbicide resistance, and not detected in sensitive lines (FIG. 17). These results suggest that expressions of CyPPO2 and CyPPO8 proteins were maintained in the next generations of the resistant lines, providing resistance.

8-3. Examination of Stable Inheritance of Transgene Using BAR Gene

Stable inheritance of the transgene to the next generation was investigated by examining integration of the transformed gene, BAR into the genome. Genomic DNAs were isolated from 100 mg of the leaves of CyPPO2 and CyPPO8 transformants, and then integration of BAR gene was examined by PCR. As a result, genome integration of BAR gene was observed in both tiafenacil-resistant and sensitive lines of the CyPPO2 transformant and CyPPO8 transformant, indicating stable inheritance of the transformed genes to the next generation.

Example 9. Examination of Herbicide Resistance of Transformed Arabidopsis thaliana

To examine whether herbicide resistance traits are maintained in the next generations of plants, respective T2 generation plants of Arabidopsis thaliana which were transformed with CyPPO2, CyPPO4 and CyPPO8 genes were subjected to an herbicide resistance test. 2˜3 ml of 0.5 μM Tiafenacil, 1 μM Saflufenacil, or 3 μM Fomesafen was sprayed onto each Arabidopsis thaliana plant grown for about 4 weeks. At 7 days after spraying, the wild-type Col-0 plants were killed, whereas the positive control, mutant AtPPO1 transformant and the experimental groups, CyPPO2 transformant, CyPPO4 transformant and CyPPO8 transformant continued to grow without damage (FIGS. 18 and 19), indicating that herbicide resistance traits of T1 plants were maintained well to provide T2 generations with herbicide resistance.

Example 10. Cross Use Experiment of Plural Herbicides with Different Mechanism of Action

In Arabidopsis thaliana transformant including CyPPO2 or CyPPO8 gene, which was obtained by transformation using the plant transformation vector prepared in Example 6, the PPO activity-inhibiting herbicide-resistant gene and glufosinate-resistant gene are expressed at the same time. Therefore, it was examined whether cross-treatment of Arabidopsis thaliana transformant with two herbicides, namely, PPO activity-inhibiting herbicide and glufosinate is effective for weed control. To this end, seeds of CyPPO2 and BAR gene-inserted Arabidopsis thaliana transformant, or CyPPO8 and BAR gene-inserted Arabidopsis thaliana transformant were sterilized and treated at low temperature of 4° C. for 2 days. The seeds were sown in a 1/2 MS medium (Duchefa), a 1/2MS medium containing 70 nM Tiafenacil, a 1/2MS medium containing 50 uM glufosinate, or a 1/2MS medium containing 70 nM Tiafenacil and 50 uM glufosinate, and grown at 23° C. under 16 hour-light/8 hour-dark conditions for 7˜14 days. Arabidopsis thaliana on the herbicide media was CyPPO2 or CyPPO8-transformed seed and the wild-type Col0 as a control, respectively. The transformant and the control were cultured on herbicide media. After 2 weeks, they were examined. As a result, CyPPO2 and CyPPO8 normally grew on a glufosinate-added medium, a Tiafenacil-added medium, or a glufosinate and Tiafenacil-added medium, whereas the control Col0 was not germinated (see FIG. 20).

These results show that when transformed plants are prepared by recombination of the PPO herbicide-resistant gene of the present invention and BAR gene in a binary vector, and cross- or double-treatment of these GM plants with herbicides having different mechanism of action is performed, undesired plants can be controlled.

In this Example, BAR gene introduced as a recombinant gene, together with CyPPO gene, is illustrative only for a resistant gene, and there is no limitation in the type of the gene to be used in the present invention. It is apparent to those skilled in the art that when a resistant gene adequate for the purpose and CyPPO 2, 4, 8 or 12 are recombined with the binary vector, and herbicides to which respective genes are resistant are cross-treated, desired resistance can be obtained.

Example 11. Cross Use Experiment of Plural PPO Herbicides

In Example 9, it was confirmed that Arabidopsis thaliana transformant prepared in the present invention has resistance against the two PPO-based herbicides, Tiafenacil and Saflufenacil at the same time, and therefore, it was tested whether the cross-treatment of Arabidopsis thaliana transformant with Tiafenacil and Saflufenacil is effective for weed control. To this end, seeds of CyPPO2 or CyPPO8 gene-inserted Arabidopsis thaliana transformant were sterilized and treated at low temperature of 4° C. for 2 days. The seeds were sown in a 1/2 MS medium, a 1/2MS medium containing 70 nM Tiafenacil, a 1/2MS medium containing 70 nM Saflufenacil, or a 1/2MS medium containing 35 nM Tiafenacil and 35 nM Saflufenacil, and grown at 23° C. under 16 hour-light/8 hour-dark conditions for 7˜14 days. Arabidopsis thaliana on the herbicide media was CyPPO2 or CyPPO8-transformed seed and the wild-type Col0 as a control, respectively. The transformant and the control were cultured on herbicide media. After 2 weeks, they were examined. As a result, CyPPO2 and CyPPO8 normally grew on a Tiafenacil-added medium, a Saflufenacil-added medium, or a Tiafenacil and Saflufenacil-added medium, whereas the control Col0 was not germinated (see FIG. 21).

These results show that when GM plants are prepared using PPO herbicide-resistant genes of the present invention, and cross- or double-treatment of plural PPO-based herbicides as well as single treatment of PPO-based herbicides is performed, undesired plants can be controlled.

Example 12. Examination of Herbicide Resistance According to Amino Acid Sequence Homology of CyPPO2, CyPPO4 and CyPPO8

To investigate amino acid sequence homology range of CyPPO2, CyPPO4 and CyPPO8 which maintain herbicide resistance, a part of the amino acid sequence of CyPPO2, CyPPO4 or CyPPO8 protein was replaced by a part of the amino acid sequence of NtPPO (tobacco-derived PPO gene). As a result, the amino acid sequence of the resulting CyPPO2 variant is represented by SEQ ID NO: 12, and its nucleotide sequence thereof is represented by SEQ ID NO: 13. The amino acid sequence and the nucleotide sequence of the CyPPO2 variant showed 98% sequence homology to those of CyPPO2, respectively. Further, the amino acid sequence of the CyPPO4 variant is represented by SEQ ID NO: 14, and its nucleotide sequence thereof is represented by SEQ ID NO: 15. The amino acid sequence and the nucleotide sequence of the CyPPO4 variant showed 98% sequence homology to those of CyPPO4, respectively. Further, the amino acid sequence of the CyPPO8 variant is represented by SEQ ID NO: 16, and its nucleotide sequence thereof is represented by SEQ ID NO: 17. The amino acid sequence and the nucleotide sequence of the CyPPO8 variant showed 98% sequence homology to those of CyPPO8, respectively.

Herbicide resistance of the amino acid sequence variant of CyPPO2, the amino acid sequence variant of CyPPO4, and the amino acid sequence variant of CyPPO8 was investigated in PPO-deficient BT3 E. coli [BT3(ΔPPO)], and a specific experimental method is similar to that of Example 3. In the same manner as in Example 3, as a negative control, the wild-type PPO (wild-type AtPPO1) of Arabidopsis thaliana was employed as a reference for herbicide-sensitivity. As a positive control, the mutant AtPPO1 which was prepared by amino acid replacement of Y426M and 5305L in the wild-type amino acid sequence was employed as a reference for herbicide-resistance.

12-1. Preparation of Experimental Materials and Instruments

An autoclave was used under conditions of 121° C. and 15 minutes, and an incubator was used at 37° C. with lighting of 169 μmol⁻²s⁻¹ for a culture time of 14˜16 hours. A UV-visible spectrophotometer was used at 600 nm. PCR was performed under conditions of at 94° C. for 4 minutes, and 25 cycles (at 94° C. for 30 seconds, at 56˜60° C. for 30 seconds and at 72° C. for 3 minutes), at 72° C. for 5 minutes and at 4° C. for 5 minutes. The herbicides used in the experiment are given in the following Table 8. Respective herbicides were prepared at a concentration of 200 mM in DMSO, and stored at −20° C. Before use, the herbicides were diluted and added to LB broth medium (containing 34 mg/ml chloramphenicol).

TABLE 8 Herbicide Chemical family (original name) Manufacturer/Supplier Pyrimidinedione Tiafenacil Dongbu Farm Hannong Co., Ltd./Dongbu Farm Hannong Co., Ltd. Saflufenacil BASF/Sigma Butafenacil Syngenta/Sigma Diphenyl ether Fomesafen Syngenta/Sigma Acifluorfen United Phosphorus/Supelco Oxyfluorfen Dow/Sigma N-phenylphthalimides Flumioxazin Sumitomo/Sigma Triazolinones Sulfentrazone FMC/Waka Oxizolidinediones Pentoxazone Kaken/Sigma Phenylpyrazoles Pyraflufen-ethyl Nihon Nohyaky/Sigma Others Pyraclonil Kyoyu Agri/Sigma Oxadiazoles Oxadiazon Bayer/Sigma Thiadiazoles Fluthiacet-methyl FMC/Sigma

12-2. Experimental Method

Saturated cells were inoculated in 3 ml of LB liquid medium containing chloramphenicol, and then cultured at 37° C., 200 rpm for 5 hours. Density of the cultured cells was measured at 600 nm, and the transformants were diluted with LB liquid medium to have the same absorbance (OD₆₀₀) per 1 ml thereof (OD₆₀₀=0.5). Agar was added to LB liquid medium at a concentration of 1%, and then autoclaved. Chloramphenicol (34 μg/ml) and herbicide were added and mixed. Cells diluted equally was diluted at a density of 10°, 10⁻¹, 10⁻², 10⁻³, 10⁻⁴, and 10⁻⁵. Each 10 μl of the cells was dropped on 1% agar, LB solid medium, and cultured in a 37° C. incubator for 14˜16 hours (light condition: 169 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹).

pACBB-CyPPO2, pACBB-CyPPO4 and pACBB-CyPPO8 were used as templates to prepare primers for the region to be replaced (Table 9), and PCR was performed to prepare pACBB-CyPPO2 variant, pACBB-CyPPO4 variant and pACBB-CyPPO8 variant vectors. 50 μl of PCR reaction mixture was prepared by mixing 1 μl of each template (pACBB-CyPPO2, pACBB-CyPPO4 and pACBB-CyPPO8 original), 5 μl of 10× buffer, 1 μl of dNTP mixture (each 10 mM), 1 μl of a forward primer (10 μM), 1 μl of a reverse primer (10 μM), 35 μl of DDW, and 1 μl of Pfu-X (Solgent, 2.5 unit/μl), and amplification was performed under conditions of at 94° C. for 4 minutes, and 25 cycles (at 94° C. for 30 seconds, at 56° C. for 30 seconds and at 72° C. for 3 minutes), at 72° C. for 5 minutes and at 4° C. for 5 minutes.

TABLE 9 SEQ ID Strain Primer Sequence (for pACBB cloning) NO: Oscillatoria CyPPO2Nt98%_F ATCTGATCAAAAGCAATTTTCTGAGTTTTCCGG 29 nigro-viridis  GGAAAC 7112 PCC CyPPO2Nt98%_R CAATTGGATTTGAAGGTAA 30 CGGTTGCAGCTTATTTTCC Lyngbya sp. CyPPO4-Nt-98%_F ATCTGATCAAAAGCAATTTTTTAAGTCCTGGA 31 PCC 8106 GGTAAACT CyPPO4-Nt-98%_R CAATTGGATTTGAAGGTAA 32 AGGCATGAGTTGACCATTC Halothece sp. CyPPO8_Nt98%-F ATCTGATCAAAAGCAATTTTCTGAGTCCAATC 33 PCC 7418 GGGAAAC CyPPO8_Nt98%-R CAATTGGATTTGAAGGTAAAGGGCGCAGTTTC 34 CCCTCCC

To prepare BT3(ΔPPO) competent cells, BT3(ΔPPO) strain was added to 5 ml of LB broth containing 50 μg/ml kanamycin and 20 μg/ml hematin, and cultured in a 37° C. shaking incubator for 12 hours in the dark. Thereafter, 5 ml of the culture was added to 100 ml of LB broth containing 20 μg/ml hematin, and cultured in a 37° C. shaking incubator in the dark until OD₆₀₀ reached 0.5. BT3(ΔPPO) competent cells were prepared from the cultured E. coli using CaCl₂ according to protocols for preparing competent cells. Next, to transform the BT3(ΔPPO) strain with the respective vectors harboring the CyPPO2 variant, CyPPO4 variant and CyPPO8 variant, 5 μl of the vector was added to 100 μl of BT3(ΔPPO) competent cells, and the mixture was mixed well, allowed to react on ice for 20 minutes, and then left at 42° C. for 40 seconds. After stabilization on ice for 2 minutes, 1 ml of LB broth was added to BT3(ΔPPO), and cultured at 37° C. for 1 hour with shaking. The cells cultured in the medium were collected according to the type of the gene insert, and then spread on LB solid medium containing chloramphenicol (34 μg/ml), and cultured at 37° C. for 12 hours or longer. Thereafter, single colonies thereof were cultured in LB liquid medium. Growth inhibition was measured according to herbicide treatment in the light, and compared with that of the BT3 transformed strain which was cultured on LB solid medium without herbicide, and growth of the BT3 transformed strain on LB solid medium with varying concentrations of herbicide was examined.

12-3. Experimental Result

FIGS. 22 to 25 show the results of examining herbicide resistance of CyPPO2 variant, CyPPO4 variant and CyPPO8 variant genes having 98% sequence homology to the original sequences of CyPPO2, CyPPO4 and CyPPO8, respectively. As a negative control, the wild-type AtPPO1 was employed as a reference for herbicide-sensitivity. As a positive control, the mutant AtPPO1 was employed as a reference for herbicide-resistance. If a strain shows resistance similar to or higher than that of the strain transformed with the mutant AtPPO1, it was determined that the strain has herbicide resistance.

As a result, respective BT3 strains transformed with CyPPO2 variant, CyPPO4 variant and CyPPO8 variant grew well in the light in all 13 types of herbicides from 9 families (Tiafenacil, Saflufenacil, Butafenacil, Fomesafen, Acifluorfen, Oxyfluorfen, Flumioxazin, Sulfentrazone, Pentoxazone, Pyraflufen-ethyl, Pyraclonil, Oxadiazon, Fluthiacet-methyl), and they showed herbicide resistance similar to or higher than that of the positive control mutant AtPPO1 (growth inhibitions thereof were hardly observed even at 25 μM).

Therefore, CyPPO2 variant, CyPPO4 variant and CyPPO8 variant having 98% sequence homology to CyPPO2, CyPPO4 and CyPPO8 also showed resistance similar to or higher than those of CyPPO2, CyPPO4 and CyPPO8, suggesting that although a part of the sequence of CyPPO2, CyPPO4 or CyPPO8 is altered, it maintains the PPO function and biological activity regarding herbicide resistance. 

1. A composition for conferring or enhancing herbicide resistance on a plant or an alga, the composition comprising one or more polypeptides or genes selected from the group consisting of a polypeptide consisting of an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or an amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto, or a gene encoding the polypeptide; a polypeptide consisting of an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3 or an amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto, or a gene encoding the polypeptide; a polypeptide consisting of an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5 or an amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto, or a gene encoding the polypeptide; and a polypeptide consisting of an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 7 or an amino acid sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto, or a gene encoding the polypeptide.
 2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the gene is a gene consisting of a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2 or a nucleotide sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; a gene consisting of a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4 or a nucleotide sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; a gene consisting of a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 6 or a nucleotide sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto; or a gene consisting of a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 8 or a nucleotide sequence having 95% or higher homology thereto.
 3. The composition of claim 1, wherein the gene is included in the form of a recombinant plant expression vector or a recombinant algae expression vector.
 4. The composition of claim 1, wherein the herbicide is protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides.
 5. The composition of claim 4, wherein the herbicide is one or more selected from the group consisting of pyrimidinediones, diphenyl-ethers, phenylpyrazoles, N-phenylphthalimides, thiadiazoles, oxadiazoles, triazolinones, oxazolidinediones, and any combinations thereof.
 6. The composition of claim 4, wherein the herbicide is one or more selected from the group consisting of butafenacil, saflufenacil, benzfendizone, tiafenacil, fomesafen, oxyfluorfen, aclonifen, acifluorfen, bifenox, ethoxyfen, lactofen, chlomethoxyfen, chlorintrofen, fluoroglycofen-ethyl, halosafen, pyraflufen-ethyl, fluazolate, flumioxazin, cinidon-ethyl, flumiclorac-pentyl, fluthiacet, thidiazimin, oxadiargyl, oxadiazon, carfentrazone, sulfentrazone, azafenidin, pentoxazone, pyraclonil, flufenpyr-ethyl, profluazol, and any combinations thereof.
 7. The composition of claim 1, wherein the plant is monocotyledonous plants, dicotyledonous plants, herbaceous plants, or woody plants.
 8. The composition of claim 1, wherein the plant or the alga additionally comprises a second herbicide-resistant polypeptide or a gene encoding the corresponding peptides, thereby having novel or enhanced resistance against the second herbicide.
 9. The composition of claim 8, wherein the second herbicide is one or more selected from the group consisting of glyphosate, glufosinate, dicamba, 2,4-D(2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid), isoxaflutole, ALS (acetolactate synthase)-inhibiting herbicide, a photosystem II-inhibiting herbicide, a phenylurea-based herbicide, a bromoxynil-based herbicide, and any combinations thereof.
 10. The composition of claim 8, wherein the second herbicide-resistant polypeptide is one or more selected from the group consisting of glyphosate herbicide-resistant EPSPS (glyphosate resistant 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase), GOX (glyphosate oxidase), GAT (glyphosate-N-acetyltransferase), or glyphosate decarboxylase; glufosinate herbicide-resistant PAT(phosphinothricin-N-acetyltransferase); dicamba herbicide-resistant DMO (monooxygenase); 2,4-D(2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) herbicide-resistant 2,4-D monooxygenase or AAD(aryloxyalkanoate Dioxygenase); ALS (acetolactate synthase)-inhibiting sulfonylurea-based herbicide-resistant AHAS (acetohydroxyacid synthase), or AtAHASL (Acetohydroxyacid synthase Large Subunit); photosystem II-inhibiting herbicide-resistant photosystem II protein D1; phenylurea-based herbicide-resistant cytochrome P450; plastid-inhibiting herbicide-resistant HPPD (Hydroxylphenylpyruvate dioxygenase); bromoxynil herbicide-resistant nitrilase; and any combinations thereof.
 11. The composition of claim 8, wherein the gene encoding the second herbicide-resistant polypeptide is one or more selected from the group consisting of glyphosate herbicide-resistant CP4 EPSPS, MEPSPS, 2MEPSPS, GOXV247, GAT4601, or GAT4621 gene; glufosinate herbicide-resistant BAR or PAT gene; dicamba herbicide-resistant DMO gene; 2,4-D(2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) herbicide-resistant AAD-1 or AAD-12 gene; isoxaflutole herbicide-resistant HPPDPF W336 gene; sulfonylurea-based herbicide-resistant ALS, CSR1, CSR1-1, CSR1-2, GM-HRA, S4-HRA, ZM-HRA, SURA or SURB; photosystem II-inhibiting herbicide-resistant PSBA gene; phenylurea herbicide-resistant CYP76B1 gene; bromoxynil herbicide-resistant BXN gene; and any combinations thereof.
 12. A transformant having herbicide resistance, or a clone or progeny thereof, comprising the polypeptide or gene of claim
 1. 13. The transformant, clone or progeny thereof of claim 12, wherein the transformant is plant cell, protoplast, callus, hypocotyl, seed, cotyledon, shoot, or plants including commercial crops.
 14. A method of preparing a plant or an alga having herbicide resistance, the method comprising transforming an alga, plant cell, protoplast, callus, hypocotyl, seed, cotyledon, shoot, or plant including commercial crops with the polypeptide or gene of claim
 1. 15. A method for conferring or enhancing herbicide resistance on a plant an alga, the method including transforming an alga, plant cell, protoplast, callus, hypocotyl, seed, cotyledon, shoot, or plants including commercial crops with the polypeptide or gene of claim
 1. 16. A method of controlling weeds in a cropland, the method comprising providing the cropland with a plant including the polypeptide or gene of claim 1, and applying an effective dosage of protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicide to the croplands.
 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the applying an effective dosage of a protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicide to the cropland is performed by applying two or more combinations of protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides at an effective dosage thereof, sequentially or simultaneously.
 18. The method of claim 16, wherein the plant is a plant further comprising a second herbicide-resistant polypeptide or gene encoding the corresponding peptides, and the protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicide and the second herbicide are applied to the cropland at an effective dosage thereof, sequentially or simultaneously.
 19. A method of controlling undesired aquatic species in a cultivation medium, the method comprising providing the cultivation medium with an alga including the polypeptide or gene of claim 1, and applying an effective dosage of protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicide to the cultivation medium. 